Yes, I talk to my relatives there.

If this were a program meant to build out a robust network, then yes that would be the way. But this program is meant to get broadband to rural areas so they can take advantage of the economic benefits. That means ASAP. This yet another example of an investment losing focus and allowing the best to become the enemy of the good.

If he had just said it's inferior, I might have taken a closer look. But tacking on a complaint about "it will make Musk richer" makes me suspicious right away.

Would this needs lots of energy storage connected to the grid?

These were the people who called Trump a Nazi just a few months ago.

It's the bottleneck. A new phone in 2025 should be running on UFS 4.0, at least.

Zuck, Bezos, and Musk are still the same and have the same amount of wealth-enabled power as they did a year ago. Is it just the decision to not cooperate with government requests to take down information that makes one suddenly an oligarch?

should require visual mockups of what that would look like if it were applied to past instances of lying by that government.

Correction, their beliefs have narrowed more in recent years, mocking and criticizing even the First Amendment itself.

"Freeze peach" is a Redditism coined by a small segment of the chronically online who believe the idea of free speech is entirely defined by and encompassed entirely within the US First Amendment, and no more.

Those must be pro-market...

The "Puerto Ricans are trash" fiasco is not only likely putting Pennsylvania solidly in the Blue column -- where it was already leaning -- but it is also getting strong reaction from Black males across the country.

The misquote plus the race-attributed opinion is classic Reddit

Almost every popular Chinese app is an "everything app" or strives to be one. The only pure internet browser is Edge. There's Chrome but it's been so inundated with negative reviews nobody downloads it. But even Edge is dwarfed by domestic "web browser" apps like Baidu and 360 that have short videos, shopping, movies, travel booking all rolled into them.

He states both, and tacking on his personal views diminishes what is presented ostensibly as a decision made "clearly" due to law. The unnecessary remark fuels skepticism.

If people in both countries can access Reddit in addition to multiple other social media sites, then this idea of blocking a narrow set of .ru domains to obstruct spies cannot pass the sniff test. What an idiotic post. Being pro-Ukraine is one thing, assuming Slashdotters will fall for such moronic argument is quite another.

BTW, did the US block access to any official Iraqi websites in 2003? More recently, Iran has been implicated in assassination plots against Trump. Has the US government blocked any Iranian domains in accordance with your brilliant plan for obstructing spies? Of course, not, because it's like trying to dam up a river with your hand. "Just like everyone would"... pffft gtfo, go rile up some tech illiterate boomers on facebook or wherever you came from.