Comment Most likely the stupid kids (Score 1) 34
Smart kids who want to learn don't destroy their tools
Smart kids who want to learn don't destroy their tools
The technology for verifying the location of chips would rely on the chips communicating with a secured computer server that would use the length of time it takes for the signal to reach the server to verify where chips are, a concept that relies on knowing that computer signals move at the speed of light."
My ping time suggests that computer signals do not in fact move at the speed of light. This sounds like a massive pain in the ass false positive waiting to happen. If the US wants to make sure nobody wants to buy its chips, this is probably a great way to do it.
This is true.
A rule of thumb is that wired devices run around 60-70 percent of the speed of light. And that in free space, Light moves around a foot per nanosecond.
IT would be pretty complex anyhow. And then there are VPNs, which can be based in the US, but might be anywhere else.
Why do you think you should come later, buy the same, and have more meaning as a customer than them?
The first customer is getting several hours (or more) of comfy coffee shop sitting time, and the second customer is getting none. So why do you think that by coming earlier and buying the same, you have more meaning as a customer than them?
He might be angry that his "I will never come to an office again" outlook is being jeopardized, and he can't do anything about it. I'm not even being a smartass. This is going to be a problem for some people.
A coffee shop is not a rented office space that can be acquired for the cost of one latte. I can see where they're coming from.
But...But... The coffee shops owe these people. Having the best of the best programmers at your shop is nothing to sneeze at.
SHOULD have pointed them to 'suzyqable' adapters on ebay, and mrchromebox.
Then we'd have kids posting fun videos of chromebooks playing videogames instead.
But alas, we get to point out that 'maybe its not smart to skimp on short isolation circuitry on the usb port', and that 'maybe regulations are needed' instead.
The message nobody in power wants to have!
What a shame.
Is anybody going to mention the $25B set aside under Biden to upgrade ATC? and then cancelled by trump?
THIS is not a first or third world problem, this is s trump problem
Actually, I think the legal term might be "latches", but I haven't seen the original promise.
Still, if anyone feels like suing Whoop, they've probably got a good case.
Maybe this is part of the "replace".
IIUC, the plan is that if the chip doesn't receive the appropriate acknowledgement from a remote server it will "refuse to boot". Like many games.
It's doable, but I can't imagine anyone buying it. (Well, I've got a weak imagination in some directions.) This seems pretty much a guarantee to put the vendor out of the business. Even within the US one probably couldn't rely on getting acknowledgement to proceed. (And it would require not only the chip to be designed, but also the motherboard would need to have a special trace running to each of the "protected" chips. And you couldn't run it off-line.
The estimate I've heard is "about 5 years and a tiny bit more". Of course, this depends on exactly which chips you are talking about. IIUC, Holland is still the only source for the best photolithography machines. That may slow them down a bit...unless the US pisses off the EU.
"Gotcha, you snot-necked weenies!" -- Post Bros. Comics