You mean, like this one? https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimg.nzz.ch%2F2022%2F10%2F26%2F... ?
Or this one? https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhips.hearstapps.com%2Fhm...

Getty Images has a file: https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.gettyimages.com%2Fph...
Don't stop at the first page, go down to the bottom and click next; there are 46 pages of images.

Cease.

"Seize" gives a completely different meaning!

Did you post this with voice recognition?

But that's easy.

If it's too late, it doesn't matter what action you take.

I suppose the question is, too late for what? Too late to stop some amount of global warming and consequent climate change? Yes. Too late to stop the most catastrophic effects? No, not too late.

Yes, you are. You just said it's too late to address it.

Power divided by time?? Watts per second, which would be joules per second per second???

No.

Original poster was correct; what matters is how much power the storage can provide, and for how long. Watts, and watt-hours (or, at utility scale, megawatts and megawatt-hours),

That's power...

... and that is storage capacity

Laying off the maintanence engineers for what you youself call "antiquated equipment" certainly hurt Newark, yes.

You're correct that the problems are long standing. Getting rid of the people keeping it running, however, is not a useful thing to do.

He says that as if it were a bad thing.

So laying off 100 of the maintenance technicians and telecommunications specialists that kept it running was a genius idea, you say?

A 25% tariff on iPhones is a bit more significant than just "a fraction of one half of one item in TFA's list." It is a major threat.
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nbcnews.com%2Fbusine...

Warming is not linear, but the curve is logarithmic in the concentration of IR absorbing gasses, so there isn't exactly a "ceiling", although the rate of warming with increasing concentration does decrease. That's why climate sensitivity is expressed in terms of degrees C per doubling: going from 1 to 2 times the baseline concentration has the same effect as going from 2 to 4, etc..

However, we haven't yet even reached a single doubling, so the rate is still very much in the linear range.

True, but those naturally-occurring cycles are on a time scale of tens of thousands of years .

The current warming is orders of magnitude faster.

Not.

"The Government Accountability Office, for example, found that 77% of highway projects in the USA experienced cost escalation (in Kaliba et al., 2008). Merewitz (1973) suggests that the average overrun of infrastructure projects is a little over 50 percent (Merewitz, 1973)."

https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fpdf%2F1307.217...

Although compared to the massive cost overruns of some military procurements, I suppose 50% is in the noise.

The US did tests (Project Plowshare), but never actually tried to implement it.
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2F...