Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Submission + - C++ Standards Contributor Expelled For 'The Undefined Behavior Question' 23

suntzu3000 writes: Andrew Tomazos, a long-time contributor to the ISO C++ standards committee, recently published a technical paper titled The Undefined Behavior Question . The paper explores the semantics of undefined behavior in C++ and examines this topic in the context of related research. However, controversy arose regarding the paper's title.

Some critics pointed out similarities between the title and Karl Marx's 1844 essay On The Jewish Question , as well as the historical implications of the Jewish Question, a term associated with debates and events leading up to World War II. This led to accusations that the title was "historically insensitive."

In response to requests to change the title, Mr. Tomazos declined, stating that "We cannot allow such an important word as 'question' to become a form of hate speech." He argued that the term was used in its plain, technical sense and had no connection to the historical context cited by critics.

Following this decision, Mr. Tomazos was expelled from the Standard C++ Foundation, and his membership in the ISO WG21 C++ Standards Committee was revoked.

Comment orange car (Score 0, Troll) 199

Burning fosil fuels is the problem and it is obvious that hybrid cars do not help here. Simply limit your choice to electic cars. Anything else that is claimed to be a "green" car is bullshit.

All additional arguments around efficiency, production and power net sources come after that. Of course, whether you really need a car comes before that, but if you buy a car and want to be "green" (in the slightest amount), buy electric.

Comment the question (Score 1) 93

The answer: (-80538738812075974)^3 + (80435758145817515)^3 + (12602123297335631)^3 = 42.

No, the answer is 42, the question is What does
  (-80538738812075974)^3 + (80435758145817515)^3 + (12602123297335631)^3 equal?

They found, after a much heavier calculation than they needed for the other numbers, 42.
The analogy with THHG is better than suggested!

Comment Re:RIGHT ON TIME (Score 1) 221

Bitcoin has lost approximately $1000.00 in value since yesterday. It's lost half it's value in the past 18 months.

First I thought that this must be wrong because it is extremely little value lost, but then I understood that you probably mean per BTC. This doesn't mean anything on itself. The unit is arbitrary. One satoshi has lost approximately 0.00001 USD states the same. This kind of information is only sensible if you know how much BTC you have, or how much people typically have, or maybe how many BTC there are.

This is what passes for a "rally" these days, I guess. Anything can mean anything now. I can deny saying what I am on tape saying over international television, AND YOUR LIBERAL FACT-CHECKING MEANS NOTHING. If you buy Bitcoin at $15,000 and it's under $8000 today, you're getting rich. Losing money is getting rich. Failing is succeeding. Lying means you're "telling it like it is". Bankruptcy is a sign of success.

I don't understand much of this.

Comment Re:Don't be stupid. (Score 1) 129

One should not need to be told that it is unsafe to click links in emails, or that virus scanners don't alert you via popups on a web page. Understanding of the basics of how these things work make it obvious, and make safe browsing practices just as obvious.

Not always as obvious. If some company you are connected to, also those who should be concerned with security, sends a text/plain e-mail with a URL for you to copy and paste, it should be fine, right? But how can I be sure that not some employer of the company has copied a look-alike phishing URL from Twitter or wherever into the e-mail?

I agree that almost all kinds of scams are easy to be detected by anyone with "digital street smarts", but in some cases, like Unicode URLs from the article, it is not obvious how to be secure.

Of course companies send text/html, but anyways...

Comment strategy (Score 1) 493

I have seen many comments on why Microsoft acquired GitHub, but at least one argument I found missing. On GitHub software that is not Microsoft's thrives. It is obviously benificial for MS to have the power to screw with this competitive ecosystem of software and developers.

As for me, I consciously chose to not use GitHub to host my projects. I use Savannah for this, an alternative that was also prominently missing in the comments so far.

Slashdot Top Deals

Usage: fortune -P [-f] -a [xsz] Q: file [rKe9] -v6[+] file1 ...

Working...