Comment Re:Makes sense (Score 5, Informative) 105
It doesnâ(TM)t make sense to allow moles walking around that that could compromise security. When I worked in a highly sensitive environment that involved sensitive information I was bound by law what I could and could not say. And this is for good reason. Just because someone gets a press pass doesnâ(TM)t mean they should get privileges behind closed doors and able to leak whatever they find.
You seem to have a misconception of what access the press pass actually provided. It allowed them to be on site, yes, but didn't give them unlimited access to the whole building. Secure areas were still secure. Journalistic ethics prevent them from soliciting classified information. No one in the building has to talk to them. (Sounds a lot like "don't ask, don't tell", come to think of it.) On the other hand, if some fifth tier staffer or a 4-star general feels compelled to provide an unfiltered opinion about something, well, that's one difference between democracy and autocracy. The journalists at the Pentagon exist to keep an eye on how our military is being run. Hegseth said he wanted the most transparent Pentagon ever, then clammed up and stopped providing press conferences and answering questions, and now is kicking out the very people to provide that window for the American people. Sounds like sour grapes to me.
Journalists might indeed be given classified info by motivated leakers, but the Pentagon Papers case indicates that can be permissibile under our Constitution. But they aren't "moles" feeding all the goods to foreign adversaries. Journalists careful vet the information they receive, and are choosy about what they report. The tend to be protect classified information - unlike some people - and will protect sources, methods, and live intel - unlike some people - because they recognize that it can get people killed.