Comment Re: Excellent Move (Score 1) 72
It's all in the definition of "qualified".
Which the law defines as a college degree.
It's all in the definition of "qualified".
Which the law defines as a college degree.
I'm not sure I'd call it "fraud" per se. Companies usually comply with the letter of the law, just not the spirit.
The letter of the H1B law says its for when qualified domestic workers cannot be found and that the pay cannot be lower than a qualified domestic worker. So yes, H1B is routinely abused, not complied with by law nor by spirit.
The fact is they blocked several companies, but didn't lower the number of visas being issued. So what they are doing is redistributing who gets visas (which smacks of favoritism and corruption)
Except they are excluding the companies found abusing the system, in turn leaving the companies complying with the rules alone. Complying with the H1B program as enacted by Congress is neither favoritism nor corruption. Quite the opposite actually.
As much as I despise a lot of what this current administration is doing, we still have to acknowledge when they do something right.
Ah, you are new here aren't you.
Founds the commie insurgent.
.... now people have to get an Amazon prime subscription
No, a dirt cheap amazon firestick will work with a shared amazon household account. So only one household member needs an account.
The Emmy's have abandoned broadcast television. Why haven't you?
Well, with the Emmy's leaving broadcast for Amazon, broadcast is getting better and Amazon worse.
Is it just me or is a doctor who can't figure out how to turn off an audio setting scary? What happens if his shoe becomes untied on the way to the operating theater? Does he call tech support?
Tolerance of abuse is enablement,
What abuse are you referring to? Disagreement?
... but enablement of abuse is all you want
Nope. What I want to enable is disagreement.
.... because you want to be enabled to abuse
Nope, no one wants real, actual abuse.
Please try to state what it is you actually mean by abuse, it seems an empty intentionally vague word in your usage.
You have that in common with all rapeublicans.
Not a republican, not a Trump supporter. Those are just your bad guesses, you trying to map things into your incredibly simplistic world view.
That's why you all voted for the child rapist, you admire his rapes.
Thank you for outing yourself as a complete idiot.
That might be true, except everyone who has been paying attention knows that all they have to do is buy enough Trumpcoins and the problem will dry up and blow away without fanfare.
Or we could point to the confounding factors they obviously did not address in the study, say "this study is trash no one should ever refer to or even read" and move on. You don't necessarily need a new study to invalidate a study, and this is one of those cases where you don't.
Interesting that you immediately jumped to censorship. Why is that?
It's too bad you don't know dick about luddites.
"Leaving aside the fact that you don't know the difference between an LLM and a frontier AI model"
One thing is a subset of the other. That was a weird attempt, and it failed.
We didn't used to carry telescreens in our pockets, so that's different.
Before streaming it wasn't feasible to deliver different media to different viewers, either. They all got the same things from the same channels.
Pound for pound, the amoeba is the most vicious animal on earth.