We appreciate the hard work.

So you see our civilization through the space program?

Good catch. I suspect somebody bought /. and they're milking it for ad revenue all the while trying to run it with one guy who might be an AI agent. It's on automatic pilot and will eventually spiral into irrelevancy. Good run while it lasts.

Your signature suggests that maybe you were on Nixon's side back then.

It's sad that after 30 years, Marc Andreessen turned out to be such a dipshit.

What he said!!

I could be wrong, but I suspect when OpenAI and Anthropic warn us of all the bad things that their creations are up to, it's more a ploy to show us how supposedly powerful they are rather than really inform us of something wrong. If they're using their computers to break into other people's computers, they're criminals, not the overlords of some new, amazing technology.

You know, even though about a third of American seem to think so, I don't think the Chinese are pulling for the failure of America. The only people really working for the failure of America are those MAGA morons who back this garbage.

I don't use it.

I liked the first one better except that you're too lazy to hit the shift key from time to time.

Blah! Blah! Blah! Trump did something else moronic! Blah! Blah! Blah!

I've never met anybody or seen such a person on TV or anywhere else, who wanted to grow up and work in a call center. This is exactly where AI should make a positive impact. But we all know it won't happen. There's no indication that AI call centers bots are getting anywhere near intelligent or even particularly useful. We're still whacking away at the zero and screaming "I want to talk to a human".

We're not getting the whole story here. If he's up 80% for the year, he's still doing better than most of the commenters, me included. He's just riding a steeper roller coaster than most of us can stomach. Let's see where he's at in ten years and then judge. Granted, where he's at may include prison.

We don't need AI to find out about chemicals used in WW I. Unless you think Ai is just a good search engine.

Trust me. Ain't nobody gonna use AI to develop no stinkin' chemical weapons. Or, at least, any new ones. As far as I can tell, AI isn't doing too well at figuring out chemistry. And, speaking as a chemist, the data that one might use to train AI on chemistry and biology is already pretty highly corrupted on its own, thank you.