
Journal mcgrew's Journal: They fixed it!! 4
https://f6ffb3fa-34ce-43c1-939d-77e64deb3c0c.atarimworker.io/journal.pl?op=list&uid=92797 works again! At least in FF on Win7, haven't tried it on the other two machines.
https://f6ffb3fa-34ce-43c1-939d-77e64deb3c0c.atarimworker.io/journal.pl?op=list&uid=92797 works again! At least in FF on Win7, haven't tried it on the other two machines.
Computers can figure out all kinds of problems, except the things in the world that just don't add up.
Partial Credit to Me? (Score:2)
we don't have a QA team
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Often times mistakes are made in porting and this one was a big miss. We thought that all the items had been covered in development but there are still some open issues with ops in some of the .pl - which we missed. We found that Apache 1.3 was processing .pl scripts differently than 2.2 processes them (fundamental differences) that was missed in the port. Should we have caught it? Yeah. There is no real excuse for the miss other than we thought we had all of these items buttoned down. The developers
Re: (Score:2)
Of course. Credit to a lot of folks, this was complained about by a whole lot of people. Kudos to slashdot staff for listening to us!
There were so many things that were broken (Score:2)