Comment Re:Did they consider making snail mail better? (Score 1) 71
Thank you for your question, but you wasted your time with the straw men responses.
What?
My bad for assuming the main use case was so obvious. You know an email address and want to send that person some physical document or package. You could just use the email address.
So... what I said. The sender is putting an e-mail address on something instead of a street address. Also - and I repeat - packages are not the issue. The issue is letter mail volume.
More convenient, so more likely people would send the snail mail, thereby increasing the volume of snail mail.
How? How is this more convenient? It's all fine and dandy to present a conclusion without evidence or explanation as fact, but it isn't convincing. Where is the use-case where you want me to send you a letter, but you are only providing me an e-mail address, not a street address? More, how do you figure there's a pent-up demand where people just aren't getting letters they want because providing a street address is just overwhelmingly arduous?