It *IS* fraud because I never gave them this credit card to charge me on. Saying it's not fraud would mean anyone I buy something from could charge me on any credit card they wanted, not just the one I gave them.
Late last year I cancelled a Citi credit card dues to come actual fraud charges. A month later, a charge appeared on the replacement card from an organization that had been billing me monthly for something. I flagged it as fraud in my online console, noting I had given the new card number to nobody. I got an immediate temporary credit. A month or two later, the credit was permanent. Worked as expected.
Because, if Microsoft decides to be agressive, they may as well go for DP4a support in the GPU (making all machines with intel iGPUs below the 14th gen inelegible),
According to this, 11th generation with Iris graphics support DP4a.
Ironically Airbus and Rolls Royce still sit on lots of patents especially around the clever engine ramp door systems which was made Concorde really possible.
Since the Concorde stopped flying in 2003 and French patents are good for 20 years, you would think they're not sitting on many patents any more.
to control the housing market.
Based on my own recent home sale experience, the estimated prices on Zillow (the Zestimates) do seem to be systemically higher than competitors like Redfin, although OpenDoor ended up paying us something in between Redfin and Zillow. So there is plenty of competition and Zillow is not controlling anything.
That said, as an inflation gauge, I don't really care if Zillow's price is systemically too high or too low. I only care about how much it changes over time.
FYI, Redfin has their own scam going because they not only offer to buy your home at the low end of price spectrum, they try to up sell you to their consumer real estate agent if you think you want more than the Redfin cash offer for your home. They get commission either way. Zillow on the other hand, apparently found the iAgent market unprofitable and is exiting the business. Over-estimated prices make it easier for their real estate agent business, still going, to attract customers but I suspect made it harder to buy properties at a price enabling them to profit from the flip.
Wouldn't it be so much simpler if trained some facial recognition software to recognize everyone in the employee database and then walked around with a Google Glass camera looking at people? You could, mostly, only stop non-employees, at whatever confidence level you want.
You would think Google would know how to use their own products better....
And before you flame, yes, get good ID pix of non-whites and do whatever training necessary to recognize non-whites with the same error rate as whites.
MY approach would be to talk to them instead of his authoritarian demands.
You've never had children, have you? Occasionally, talking just won't work and its necessary to threaten a nuclear consequence to get them to believe you are serious. But rarely if ever is it necessary to actually follow through. It's a negotiating tactic.
I see a president frustrated that no matter what he says or does, most of the media tries to turn it against him. So whatever Trump says, the media and progressives will claim that China is NOT controlling the WHO and that it is NOT a detriment to democracies all over the world. They will disagree that at best, the WHO was allowing China to distort and hide information about the origins and evolution of the pandemic in Wuhan. They will say we should not even consider that at worst, the WHO was helping China hide crimes related to the pandemic. So there would no way to convince the bureaucracy to, in good faith, negotiate a solution. The only way to get this to happen was to go nuclear.
If the US does "unwithdraw" from the WHO, these problems will be corrected without having to deal with the press and progressives. If that happens, who will have got what they wanted and improved the US' future relationship with the WHO?
Some people only open up to tell you that they're closed.
