Maybe this is less about security and more about who gets paid?

while what you say is true for highly expansion- and extraction-focused hypercapitalist enterprises, itâ(TM)s hardly universal. Some companies (for profit!) set as their mission community building first, which may be supported by manufacturing and services.

âoe observable upticks in feelings of well-being, but worse MADRS scoresâ

Feeling better > assessment values. Develop a better assessment.

Friends tell me that there is the occasional setup and configuration overhead. But once done, itâ(TM)s as easy as one or two clicks to be watching. The biggest problem exists on any platform-what is actually worth watching?

Thereâ(TM)s a few problems with your proposition.

First is, a lionâ(TM)s share of that cost goes to layers of rent seeking, entrenched âoeproduction and distributionâ outfits that add little value.

Second, for the zillions of creative and technical credits, itâ(TM)s not like those folks entire income depends on their contribution to that particular production.

I would agree that the people who do actual work on a production deserve adequate compensation. But the current model is broken, costs and prices and profits are unfairly disproportionate.

Verizon is the customer/consumer of government policy, paid for by sinfully legal transfers of wealth.

Why? If itâ(TM)s a data issue, surely you recognize the US (and other allied govts like Is) plus corporations spy just as hard, and to as much detriment to all but the very wealthiest and most influential? And itâ(TM)s potentially worse for them?

Everything will be better when humans are out of the loop.

assuming this is not a joke i donâ(TM)t get (likely) there appear to be two women. pregnancy was also my first guess. And it might actually be a legit experiment (ethics aside).

iâ(TM)d just love to have falling and flying simulations from Lawnmower Man.

This is a really interesting g question to me. And the question is, did the .com create the rot? Did web 2.0? Or was it inherent in some way? In my view, the problem is exclusivity and monetization/privatization. In the early days much was run on public servers, very much was publicly accessible if one knew where to look and what buttons to mash. Privatization made that more accessible to the massess, which is generally good. But it put everything behind a wall for everyone, which is bad, without keeping the best generators (think, e.g. basic researchers, investigative journalists) properly resourced and basic information properly accessible.

As you suggest, debt at the US Federal Government level is so much more complicated, not least of which enforcing collection as a result of default is problematic for debt holders. It's extremely complicated, perhaps so complicated that no-one really knows, but the short answer is that since the money is technically a part of the US federal government it simply doesn't have the same meaning as household, business, or even state/local government debt. It's really more a tool for managing international finance than it is actually money owed.

We can and should look at discuss and adjust how it works, but merely calling for a 'balanced' budget is really meaningless without defining terms and mechanisms.

Man I long for the usenet of yore. Reddit is as good as it gets, and it is sometimes an adequate replacement.

Incidentally, AI *could* be awesome for technical questions if there were decent documentation out there for systems (plus source code for software systems) and the LLM had access to it.

concur. there was some good information there, but asking and answering was a really onerous process to figure out, and i never did quite get the hang of answer vs. comment.

This statement, together with labeling residentsâ(TM) assertion of local preference as âoe community, political and regulatory disruptions,â really signals the executive classâ(TM)s complete disconnection from and apathy toward the real people living as citizens in the world. They seem to hold the assumption that their being at the forefront if aome kind of business movement is assurance they are good people doing good things, and that insensitivity to the needs of actual other people is an asset.

Itâ(TM)s a tremendous sign of hope that community disruptions are actuall a problem. for them.