On exactly what the detector is capable of detecting. If they're looking, at any point, for radio waves, then I'd start there. Do the radio waves correspond to the absorption (and therefore emission) band for any molecule or chemical bond that is likely to arise in the ice?

This is so basic that I'm thinking that if this was remotely plausible, they'd have already thought of it. This is too junior to miss. Ergo, the detector isn't looking for radio waves (which seems the most likely, given it's a particle detector, not a radio telescope), or nothing obvious exists at that frequency (which is only a meaningful answer if, indeed, it is a radio telescope).

So, the question is, what precisely does the detector actually detect?

Please don't think of me when you fap again

DROP YOUR WEAPON, YOU HAVE TEN SECONDS TO COMPLY

I want to know how they fucked up with the first disk image. That's why you have no idea why I would want to know something I didn't want to know.

It was obvious to everyone else. This is a you problem.

"There are plenty of places trying"

It cannot be "plenty" when 1.5 C is now a foregone conclusion.

I never used the original Wordperfect, I was only near people who were using it, but by the time I wanted to do any word processing at all I had an Amiga. And while I still had it, Workbench 2 came out, and brought scalable fonts along with it.

Of all the DTP software of any description, I align myself with PageMaker -> InDesign. I have used a number of packages and still go back to Adobe when I want to do some layout and typesetting. I go back to before they required a sub, though. My experience with it also goes back to Aldus. I've tried Quark, and yuck, they never did get the UI figured out worth half a shit compared to Adobe... or even Aldus.

That goes for anything you can't eat, live in, or fuck.

Pokemon may be a fad, but it's been incredibly durable.

I only know a little bit about filesystems (I haven't dug into any deeply since using fsdb on SCO Unix) but even I know that. I want to know, in what particular way did Apple fuck up?

I'm failing to see the relevance of the text to the headline. As if we were going to meet clean energy targets? As if we were trying?

They will have to, they cannot stop the industry going to downloads. This is the smartest thing they could do.

It's very interesting that game shops were mostly replaced by video game shops which now need to become game shops again.

I read the GP question as how did apple fuck this up in the first place?

You didn't offer me anything and a comment is not a signature, so no and no.

"Honest question"

You have never in slashdot history asked one of those

Ok bot

If you can waive it, it's not a right.