Comment Sorry if this sounds Marxist (Score 1) 41
If you don't want their to be only two choices that serve corporate masters then you must: vote, protest, and be prepared to withhold your labor (general strike).
If you don't want their to be only two choices that serve corporate masters then you must: vote, protest, and be prepared to withhold your labor (general strike).
Republicans and the Heritage Foundation have made it their mission to make Unitary Executive Theory more than a theory. It's more than partisanship, it is a dedication to a radical ideology.
If you're posting on slashdot you should be old enough to recognize that designers cycle through the same trends perpetually.
Guess they gotta justify their jobs and salaries somehow...
These clowns keep finding new ways to waste screen real estate.
Oval tabs do seem to waste some space, especially on the left/right margins, but I don't know if it's a lot of space.
A more pertinent question is, "How do oval tabs enhance the browser, its usage, and/or actual browsing experience?" 'cause I can't see any real benefit over rectangular tabs -- and the latter is actually more space efficient.
It's dark mode that's affected. Yes, it's possible to adjust it out. I think it's arrogant of the developers to make an appearance choice like this.
Agreed. Disable dark theme for private mode: "browser.theme.dark-private-windows" => false
In "user.js"
user_pref("browser.theme.dark-private-windows", false);
Agreed. I just watched the video and they've doubled down on the annoying changes they've been making for years now. All that rounding wastes space by definition - a square holds more of squares and circles than a circle holds of circles and squares, if you know what I mean. Why all the rounded corners? Are they afraid users will cut themselves, so they've created the browser equivalent of kiddie scissors?
They've also kept the monochromatic controls bullshit which eliminates colour as a cue for identifying the function of a button. (Wait, sorry... there are no buttons - just graphics in the areas where a button should be). What do they have against colours and defined borders?
For a long time now Mozilla has been forcing pointless changes on users in a misguided effort to stay "relevant". This is more of the same. I'll stay on version 128 as long as I can, thanks very much. And if I could go back farther, I would. I still regularly swear at my browser, and older versions were better. Ditto for Thunderbird.
I wish Mozilla would stop dicking about with esthetics. At the very least, they could make UI customization much easier than it is. All the money wasted on UI churn could be better spent on ad campaigns that would increase market share. I don't think many people are going to say "Oh, I like all those new shiny interface changes - I'm switching to Firefox!"
I'm not buying one until it's 39 cents again.
It's dark mode that's affected. Yes, it's possible to adjust it out. I think it's arrogant of the developers to make an appearance choice like this.
Someone needs to justify their existence.
You can see Waymos at intersections on the "most dangerous" list, therefore it must have to do with traffic or navigation algorithm differences (distance calculation/traffic lights etc).
Here's a list of the most dangerous intersections in San Francisco:
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsfstandard.com%2F2026%2F03...
Here's a recent YouTube video of the first intersection on that list:
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3F...
You can see a Waymo enters the frame at the top left at the 20 second mark. Also the 2 minute mark.
US AI Safety Debate Masks Competitors' 'Negligence'
Perhaps this is more about deflection.
Also, the recent related SNL Weekend Update skit was pretty entertaining, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei on AI’s Threat to Humanity, "We do not condone what we are doing."
How long will it be before there's a phone app which allows people to take pictures of the menu boards at McD's and have the geo-located data posted in real time? In a region where the density of McDonald's locations is high, such an app might make following Head Office's dynamic pricing suggestions counter-productive for franchisees.
I can also see this becoming a zero-sum war among LLMs. Zero-sum, that is, only if you ignore the societal and environmental cost of data centres churning bits.
Call me old fashioned if you must; I still say that spending all that new compute just to end up with pretty much the old pricing is a tad irresponsible, anti-social, and self-defeating. In other words, it's very corporate and very Capitalistic.
... a tool, not a mandate, designed to provide restaurant-specific recommendations to help franchisees deliver value for customers and make informed business decisions
... a suggestion which owners would do well to follow if they want continued support from Corporate, designed to help franchisees suck every possible penny from customers while engaging in rapacious business practices
McDonald's is a vampiric real estate business with a synergistic side-hustle slinging burgers and promoting malnourishment and diabetes. May they rot in hell.
Florida Invokes Extinction Fears In Legal Bid To Halt OpenAI Development
Next thing you know, they'll start believing in Evolution -- or, climate change.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.