I'm about as far from an LLM booster as possible, and hate to be that guy, but "you're holding it wrong".

ChatGPT shouldn't be used for real software development. It's a toy chatbot. If you're doing development you should be running a harness like Claude Code or OpenCode or whatever locally on your development machine. That gives the model and tools full access to your source, including private repositories, libraries, databases, documentation, bug tracker, logs, etc. These tools are also much, much better at seeing the connections between code and concepts and will do a better job understanding and writing stuff "end to end".

We've reached a point where the quality of the LLM harness is probably equally as important to the LLM itself at writing software, so if you're still using web-based stuff like ChatGPT and pasting single blocks of code or files into it, you're about 2 years behind where most other people are and it's not surprising you don't see any value from it.

We are nowhere near eliminating humans from development, but the current set of harnesses and models actually do a pretty good job when used properly and in the hands of someone who already understands the codebase and domain. They can still fuck up royally, but, well, so can humans.

"original use was meant for supporting a small diesel heater and a fan that would burn some of your car's fuel for preventing the car from freezing over"
What?
The electric charge was most commonly used to power a heating element that warmed the block and on diesels provided some warming to the fuel. I understand that some systems had blower fans but this was to prewarm the cabin& keep with windows clear.

He was desperately hoping you'd blurt something racist, so his private ideology would get that little frisson of validation.

Hey @Epeeist if the Guardian has to plaintively insist "it's perfectly safe!" that's practically proof it isn't.

"They just concluded that at some point this year, the equation ceased to give meaningful results because the predicted population shot toward infinity. That was their doomsday."

Earths population has clearly shAt towards doomsday instead.

If I were, perhaps it's because I'm not seeing any of the real stuff here.

The enemy of my enemy's enemy is my....?

Hm. What's the involution function rule for asshat corporations and their pet lobbyists?

As Eric Raymond (ESR) says, AI is a force multiplier. My elaboration: If you are good at what you do, it will let you do accomplish more good stuff faster. If you are not very bright, AI will let you be not bright more efficiently, but it won't make you bright. It's just a tool. It needs to be utilized correctly. There is no shortage of things in this world that can do tremendous damage if not used properly. AI is nothing new in that regard.

"AI slop" is so 2024. That argument isn't valid any more.

I'm surprised you didn't use the word "slop". Spewing a bunch of slogans that would have to be more clever to make it on to bumper stickers makes you look like the people you are complaining about. There are legitimate criticisms to make about AI, and ways to support and defend those arguments. You are not doing that.

Correction, no, you're right, I did assert some problems are imaginary. Only the truly mentally ill could look down, see a penis or a vagina and wonder "what the fuck am i?"

Yeah, THAT'S an imaginary problem of the dumbest order.

So you don't really have any refutation other than "I'm sad".

I didn't say people whine about imaginary problems. Their problems are absolutely real.
YOU'RE the one endorsing catastrophism. The problems they're facing - we don't have enough money, we work too hard, etc, etc - are NOT unusual, are NOT new, & never before (afaik) in human history caused this sort of a wave of infantilism "well fine then I guess I just can't have kids! mwhaa!"

It's taken a lot, but the leftists have managed to convince an entire generation that they're exceptionally incapable and unable to save themselves, just so you can offer Caesarism and the Great Nanny State to take care of them. Brilliant, I have to say. Fucking sadistic, but hey, it wins you power so I guess you win?

Pretty sure whatever he died from came from bats. Or hamsters.

There's no reason to leap to the conclusion that whatever killed him was because he was actually working directly on it. That would be irresponsible.

LOL yeah botched execution. "First all female execution team at request of Pike"

https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnypost.com%2F2026%2F10%2F01%2F...

Like I said, you're dogmatically dedicated (read: closed minded about the matter) so IDGAF what you think. That's why your reply doesn't even faintly engage with the point. Come up with a clever bon mot for your congregation and you win, right?

The objective, irrefutable truth is that
- by any measure at all, humans have had it worse, often VASTLY worse
- nevertheless, they didn't all just hold hands, wave their Gays for Palestine flags, argue about woman-penises, and decide weepily "this life is just too hard, I'm not going to bring a child into the world"

rsilvergun's really not getting his $ worth out of this account. Do better.