Good OO works, and works well, mostly because of the isolation of internal code.

But most OO code I see is procedural programming with classes.

In 1979, I already read a, for that time, very complete article about the possible weapons in space. Most of the theory was worked out. No way that the DoD would have sat for forty years on its ass doing nothing.

Dave Mustaine nailed that part already 36 years ago.

Megadeth already had a song "Amerikhastan" in 2007.

You could also buy a hybrid. My experience is that if you take care to charge your battery, you can save 50% of fuel on longer trips. If you do many small trips, you can mostly drive electrically.

Johan Wolfgang Von Goethe was onto something....

Just like White in Belgium, utter garbage.

All scams are based upon the principle that the victim has an amount of greed that makes him blind to facts.

Maybe you should read "Huckleberry Finn". I think that Samuel Clemens also found that the US was backward in his time.

Regulation is a check.

According to control theory you have three outcomes for a process, it grows unchecked to infinity (or until physical boundaries are reached), it stabilises, or it goes to zero.

For some reason, people think that because of 'money' this does not apply to these processes.

A stable process is a regulated process. That doesn't mean regulation is simple.

Hasn't this always been the case, or they forgot the lessons from the 60's and 70's, when the Japanese car manufacturers trashed them.

It's a hypothesis, not a theory...

Removal of using 'theory' as a replacement for 'hypothesis' should be mandatory...

Anyone who read "Chaos" by James Gleick, and had some mathematical knowledge, knew that was going to happen this way. I probably read it between 1987 and 1990, and have had a copy since 2000 somewhere.