Not defending the oil industry, but they have been far, far less effective at stopping the nuclear industry, mainly because they could easily just invest their money there instead.

And Trump is an idiot on climate change, but he's also been very pro-nuclear. So in a practical sense, I'd rather have him than any Democrat in the White House on this issue.

1) spread FUD about nuclear for decades, with a healthy dollop of Soviet funding, which relies heavily on their oil industry to control other countries' behavior and world events, for several decades.
2) vastly increase the time frame required to build nuclear plants via regulatory sabotage, shifting regulations every few weeks so they'll have to start over again and again and again.
3) Appoint greedy bureaucrats to constantly issue utterly "environmental" reviews that serve no other purpose but to delay years more.
4) Write dishonest articles pointing out that their sabotage has in fact, succeeded in greatly increasing the time frame, and costs, of building nuclear plants.

5) The environment loses, Earth's climate loses, democracies lose. Corrupt environmentalists and Russian oligarchs win, so...Profit?

6) I almost forgot the final step: spread disinformation and FUD and shadow ban anyone who tries to point this out. Using bots and CCP shills.

As an American, it amazes some of the laws that pass in supposedly 'democratic' societies without strong constitutional protections for speech. Europe, especially the UK, turned on its citizens so fast, so hard it's made heads spin.

Great work to the research team. This is really inspirational. Here's hoping the cost comes down as quickly as possible.

A private citizen's speech is not legal or illegal, it's a basic right which is respected in healthy democracy, excluding some extremely narrow carve outs like libel and exhortations to imminent violence.

Jimmy Kimmel just got pulled off the air for saying something despicable and factually incorrect, mainly due to pressure by Trump. That's as un-American as Biden's secret pressure campaign to ban nearly everyone saying stuff he didn't like during his term.

If it's well designed, it uses measurable CPU when you scale it. Teams has millions of active users.

Is that how they explained it on MSNBC?

Signal has been approved for use by the intelligence services for a few years. IMO, any service that allows the contacts to be manually managed should never have been allowed. It's obviously a massive security hole.

Fucking video wallpaper, and High Contrast Themes are still completely broken.

Unintentionally, but that's more of that pesky context the woke hate to mention.

Anyway, that was The Atlantic, where reporters steal classified information and don't have the journalist ethics to remove themselves when they realize they are there intentionally, then release it all to the public.

Obey the law and don't put our national security at risk. How the fuck is that controversial in any way? Oh wait, woke...

And there he is. LOL.

NVidia is a huge national security hole.

Subject says it all. Cue the wokie CCP-bots.

Aw, poor drug traffickers. 80/20 issue, dumbass. You're the nutty one, dumbass.

Says every idiot who thinks MSNBC is a news organization.