The fact that this approach is catalytic rather than requiring a binding agent seems positive in terms of longevity and not being directly depleted by repeat exposure; but I'd be curious how durable the material is under real-world conditions(clothing that gets hard wear tends to get hard washes) and also how specific it is. 'Organophosphate' means something moderately specific in the context of chemical warfare; but a lot of fairly prosaic compounds are, technically, 'organophosphates'(like DNA and RNA when held together by phosphodiester bonds); and this would be considerably less helpful in practice if it is busy chewing up the genomes of random soil bacteria; and markedly less helpful in practice if there's a "do not perturb the nanites in your clothing if you want them to not migrate into your cells and start mitigating the harmful effects of your DNA" user notice on the treated article.

This doesn't seem like a lie, a NIC is in a pretty good position to knock something off the network if it feels like it and the 'bluefield' devices have enough punch onboard to run some rules regarding whether or not to do that; but it seems like a wild exaggeration of how helpful it actually is.

If you actually have a set of rules that detect your bot being wicked it will presumably save you some CPU time to run them on the NIC rather than having the host CPU watching the traffic; but the hard part is the set of rules that detect your bot being wicked.

This is basically the equivalent of adding a firewall and claiming that you've solved network security. Yeah, the firewall is pretty well placed to block malicious traffic; defining 'malicious traffic' is left as an exercise for the reader.

Support for Office 2016 and 2019 ends October 14th of this year; I assume that the feature is dropping now; rather than either 20 years ago as part of ECMA-376 and eventually in a live product for either Office 2010 or 2013, or never if they didn't want to do that, in order to draw a hard line under the utility of those?

It otherwise seems like a kind of weird time to do it. In principle what a 'cell' is has never really had an obvious mandatory scale: it has essentially always been relevant that a 'cell' existed in relation to other cells, so that something like an array could be a row; but it has also long been allowed and encouraged to do things like substring operations that acknowledge that cell contents are 'larger' objects that contain smaller ones; and are not automatically spilled out for that reason alone. Not clear that the pragmatic use case for spreadsheets would ever have supported some sort of 'any data type that implies it can be decomposed into elements shall be' rule, strings getting broken up into substrings and so on; but it's also not clear that the pragmatic use case is going to be much clarified by a single cell being n levels deep of lists and arrays of lists and arrays being a fully supported thing rather than something you hack on by shoving JSON into text cells or whatever.

It definitely seems like asking for confusion when some, but only some, "excel spreadsheets" have cells that are arrays, potentially of arrays, while others have rows of cells with contents that, at least formally, are not acknowledged as arrays.

That's the sort of curious thing about this announcement: at least in theory(I assume things are uglier in practice) the X1 parts that they shipped for windows-on-ARM/Copilot PCs already use UEFI/ACPI in line with what MS wants for booting Windows.

That obviously doesn't mean that there's a working GPU driver; or that naive power management doesn't cause the system to run at 90% of maximum power and hammer the battery flat; but the theory was that the last gen was already doing the "big kid ARM that has embraced PC standards" thing; very similar to the 'standards base' that ARM encourages ARM server part vendors to use.

I'm always a little curious what the thinking/strategy is with the Chinese outfits. I don't necessarily expect much from the OrangePi guys; they ship a surprising number of different SoCs, including multiple architectures and multiple vendors, for their size, so are likely to be mostly at the mercy of the SoC vendors; but is the situation for someone like Allwinner such that people who want linux to work on their stuff could be a resource for them and they are just not taking advantage of that very well; or are they actively annoyed by GPL-related claims and really just want to shove minimum-viable android out the door as cheaply as possible to win cheap tablet tenders and really do not want to hear from SBC hobbyists.

SOP at Qualcomm. It has been literal years of hammering on them by Google and basically every Android handset OEM to even keep parts that ship with android support in support for more than a few years(I think the current timeline, at least for 'snapdragon 8 elite' flagship parts, is a princely 8 years from release; and that is with the 'project treble' stuff that attempts to reduce the number of changes that might potentially need to be supported). Especially with the, um, raging success, of Copilot+ AI PCs they are probably ready to pretend that X1 never happened and call it good. I'm not even sure how long the windows support on X1 is expected to last.

Seriously, how is a job applicant supposed to be able to distinguish what a hacker asks them to do versus the typical humiliation ritual that passes for the standard employment experience we are accustomed to?

It's two slightly different flavors of abuse.

No. It's not white guilt.

And it's money coming from wealthy to the poor.

The best way to do reparations is to make sure nobody goes hungry and to increase opportunities.

I think that what everyone needs to realize is we are all in this together. 99% of the population is closer to the bottom than the top.

Let's ensure no one goes hungry, homeless or had injustice. Reparations to everyone.

We should show mercy because many decent people have benefited from evil.

We can't look at countries collectively. Religions. White or dark skin. We are not at war with nations, we are complicit in theft for leaders.

If we don't punish the results of war crimes we only empower the excuses.

The Trump admin removed everything that would have prevented this war crime and implemented AI to give them another thing to point fingers at.

I'm less afraid of Iranian justice than I am of Epstein administration mercy.

When the Trump admin fires oversight, the agency that prevents civilian casualties, and hires for loyalty and evil -- it's not incompetence, it's policy.

The "AI made me" was adopted from the same company that did it in Palestine.

They killed non combatant kids because they didn't are not to kill kids.

This is war crimes. And if we don't punish the results we will only improve the excuses.

Thank you for this comment. Iâ(TM)ve been trying to put the same idea into words; the Trump administration tried to do a Bush911 but failed due to incompetent evil.

Also, deep respect to the Iranians for not being bated into a trap. The Trump admin has lessened our cyber security. Poked every bees nest. Taunted and insulted. All to get someone, anyone to attack the American people or our electronic infrastructure.

Nope. Crickets.

They arenâ(TM)t smart enough to pull off a false flag. Too lazy to drum up support. But dumb and arrogant enough to try.

Oh, and rewatching that âoeattemptâ on Trump. He stands there waiting with a fist up while someone has the presence of mind to lower the American flag hanging from a winch so it could be in the photo. Thatâ(TM)s our patriotic pathetic narrative on display. Once you see it you canâ(TM)t unsee it.

No, but it will replace the half Planck.

We donâ(TM)t need long text for short word. We already have inch and ounce. The same value but ironically less character than âoeTrumpdicks.â