I don't think this administration has any appetite for doing anything remotely pro-consumer.

Domestic cats are much more of a danger to birds than wind turbines.

It has also been shown that painting wind turbine blades can mitigate bird kills.

Thanks, those are very interesting links with solid information.

Thatâ(TM)s something your parents would say! /s

According to the article, the hit rate of drones isn't all that amazing, either.

Artillery pretty much works by saturating the area with explosions until some of them hit something. So a low hit rate is expected. Maybe a decade after the war ends we'll get some actual numbers to compare to other theaters.

That is correct, though it doesn't seem to have affected the course of the war noticeably.

Source?

That's a bold claim.

The article I linked to speaks about that. Essentially: Yes. But: Not the cheap stuff used, and stuff like fiber optics come with their own drawbacks.

The article I linked to includes prices.

Meanwhile, some reports from the frontlines indicate that while drones are ubiquituous, they aren't the game-changer the tech-industry wants them to be.

tl;dr essential bits: a) most drone strikes could have been done by other, cheaper weapons. b) drones are an unreliable weapon due to jamming, dependency on weather and light and many technical failures.

Simply doing a blackboard calculation isn't enough, you need to look at some empirical facts as well. These show that 97% of Scotland's electricity already comes from renewables.

Scotland already produces about 97% of its energy from renewable sources.

Because the ACM has more people who think John Rawls has something to say about society than Ayn Rand?

That would be the discredited political movement called "Social Darwinism", nothing to do with the theory of evolution.

I have an AVP and I agree with this comment. Sports and weight are areas of focus. But the device is already doing just fine. There are plenty of reasons to iterate it.

MoonPlayer justifies the entire price of the Apple Vision Pro. There you go, a single app makes the whole thing worthwhile. Another one would be the YouTube safari extension enabling you to watch YouTube on a 20 foot screen. Itâ(TM)s knock your socks off amazing. Spatial photos in the Apple Photos app are incredible. The environments are pretty phenomenal too.

Ridiculous argument. Absolutely nobody uses HoloLens. And the fov of HoloLens was useless.Vision Pro has a wide fov by comparison and FoV is certainly not a weak spot. Vision Pro has an active user base and itâ(TM)s selling fast enough to be profitable this year⦠paying for 8 years of development in just a year or two.