I love that you couldn't explain that without saying that they represent a financial opportunity rather than just, you know, solve a problem better than existing solutions.

They could also fire you for living out of a car. Fun choices!

TechCrunch found that the app's backend services didn't properly restrict access, allowing any logged-in user to request and receive data belong to other users.

I *loooove* how common this flaw is. I remember decades back getting hired by a guy to keep working on some event marketing website he'd had another programmer build. Took me like 10 minutes at that job to figure out you could do the exact same thing.

Another Canadian dunce who's drank the warm cup of PP ...

That has not been my experience, at all. I'm entirely against the concept of what they're doing (giving me a reason not to visit the websites that ultimately pay for the production and publication of information) but the AI summaries and links to related articles tend to be spot on what I'm looking for. Perhaps you can give me a (non-contrived) search to try that demonstrates your claim?

Texas and Florida prohibit local governments from mandating rest and water breaks.

The issue with health concerns like this is that it's not like it explodes and kills you - there's really no way to say, "It was the molecule on March 13, 2026 that started cancer in your body"

You can't even do that with cigarettes - you can only make a conclusion on cause that's well supported by circumstantial evidence.

And I'm not saying you're arguing against it, but just broadly speaking ... arguing *against* more information - unless the argument is that the information itself is inaccurate - seems particularly anti free-market to me. (Obviously that's why companies fight against the burden of regulation designed to increase market transparencies.)

The irony of your sarcasm is it actually *is* horrible.

Water is good - necessary even - but too much water will kill you. Choice is the exact same way - it's entirely possible to have too much of it, as much as that contradicts an ethos buried deeply in the American id.

Lol, so many of the posts here reek of bitter developers who have clearly never worked in the halls of quality software engineering

yeah well, everything sounds simple to people who don't quite understand the nature of the actual problem, but here's a hint:

The next day after your "simple solution": "FTC sues Google claiming that it is identifying their non-political party emails as political party emails"

"It's as if the people reporting the news don't care about being consistent"

That's just an astoundingly stupid thing to say. I don't even know where to begin with that.

Why wouldn't you just turn OneDrive off? I mean, I get it, stubborn master of your computer stuff, but honestly, you're just making shit difficult for yourself. Just turn it off.

"Usually to my desktop."

Oh my.

It's adorable you seem to think the experience of home/prosumer users is that of enterprise deployments/users.

I would argue that cruelty is the point.