Comment Re:Governments and AI (Score 1) 54
Governments are people.
Governments are people.
"These fuckers are why you are seeing less physical switch games as an example"
Buwhaha
Yeah, I know what you mean. I just did it the easy way - dropped out of university, eventually move to Montreal where it was almost *difficult* to be a programmer and not end up at a game studio. Thankfully the industry grew in Toronto as well and I was able to move back after some lovely years there.
I'm an oldhead programmer (still) in the games industry. You're thinking of DigiPen. (I didn't go there.)
it's just a pipeline for techno-oligarchs
"a name since reborn to climate change because the planet was cooling not warming"
How is this not an indictment on America's ability not to raise incredibly dumb voters? I mean
"We need to call it Super Intelligence!" Trump demanded, waggling a finger at an iPod.
Lol, this is the president some people are willing to tolerate for a party that promises you'll have lower taxes (while only giving them to the upper class) and less thinking about trans people or something. Communism! Boo! It's quite astounding.
It's actually very funny. There's a reason word of mouth has been doing the heavy lifting for this.
"No, I grew up in the 80s watching the roadrunner"
The connotation that the roadrunner in the 80s was original is hilarious.
Some place between sometimes and often - I'm not here to argue that - researchers are the first to discover.
But it's also almost meaningless to just go, "I'm such an amazing realist, the worst case happens every time."
That's not really being realist. That's just you not knowing actual things, and having an emotion.
Please tell me eadon.com is yours
The better the tracking data, the more targeted the impression, the higher the clickthru rate. Crafting tracking consent dialogs in a way that favors one app or the other is going to increase the efficiency of campaign placements that target users of that app, rather than campaigns run by app developers who experience a lower percent of users consenting to track.
And they're welcome, as a business to swallow those aquisition expenditures, or fund their own Canadian content, or not do business here.
The list of developed countries that don't have domestic cultural protection policies is low. The US doesn't have one because of its size (or I'll throw you a bone - HOW AWESOME THEY ARE) - it simply doesn't need one.
Kind of hilarious in light of how pro-protectionist things have swung there. If the US audience started consuming predominantly anime TV, movies, books, etc overnight (purely just because of how good they are, right?) you'd bet your ass US would do the exact same thing.
What you don't get is that French is useful for many people - it just wasn't useful for you - and you project that because to you, personal experience is reality. Calling Mandarin, Spanish, Hindi, and Arabic more useful languages for living, identifying with other citizens, and employment in Canada is fucking bananas - and I'm married to a Taiwanese woman and speak some Mandarin!! Nothing you've said has changed my mind. Your points are noted, but still remarkably dumb.
so why aren't they given force adoption
I feel like we need a "take Murdoch5 to a real job" day or something. I'd literally pay to sit you down some time and explain how the real world works.
"Just let me live the life I want to live, by fucking up others' lives way more than the other party may have mildly inconvenienced me for sound policy. Wait, why is this affecting me now?"
It's a tale as old as time.
Basic is a high level languish. APL is a high level anguish.