I was wondering where this horrendously poisonous line of misinformation was coming from.
You're still pushing your AIPAC-approved view of history without providing any citations which challenge the prevailing view which you're disagreeing with? You religious wingnuts are tiresome.
That's our experience, but if it's simulated, how would we know? You think that's air you're breathing?
Prove it's there when no one is observing it.
They said ice wasn't grabbing citizens but they're well over 100 on that now so your optimism is misplaced. They don't have to do anything. They could do anything with you.
Their job is to piss us off to increase engagement. They're doing it.
They often do if they are rich.
Desktop Firefox is great. Maybe you meant mobile Firefox, which has had terrible unpatched memory leaks in the JavaScript implementation for years and years. I have to kill Firefox several times a day on my phone. On my desktop it typically works fine without runaway memory use until I reboot for some other reason.
Your question is stupid and you should feel stupid. No, NATO supplying weapons to Ukraine is not NATO attacking Russia. Not even a little bit. Anyone is free to play arms dealer. Russia has done a fuck of a lot of it. Do you accuse Russia of invading countries when they supply arms to those countries' enemies? No? So why are you doing it to NATO now? Just got a taste for dictator dick?
Yawn.
Keep proving your ignorance, it's fun
Until you can train mentats, that's not going to happen.
Sapho juice is Ritalin
So, what you're saying is that long-standing vulnerabilities exist and have been overlooked on both platforms.
That's not only not what I said, it's not relevant to what I said.
This is completely, provably historically false.
So you're going to prove it, right?
Nobody was inhabiting those lands before the Jews first settled there
The Jews came from the Canaanites, and they were not the first people in the Levant either, so you are wrong on top of wrong.
it's flat out factually inaccurate to claim the Palestinians were there first.
Link to where I said that Palestinians were the first people in the Levant, or fuck right off with your collection of straw men.
You want there to be a process for Apple to give your account away to someone else against your wishes?
That's a gross mischaracterization. This is Apple refusing to give control of the accounts of children to the person with parental control of the children. People demanding that this only be done under court order are neglecting to note the fact that there is already a court order giving her parental control, which is in the first paragraph of the summary.
I've been through this. My Apple ID now ends in +A because my ex-fiancé owns the one with my regular address. Because it was easier for me to give it to her and start over. Would I have preferred a way to split the account so she could keep her purchases and I could keep Angry Birds? Yes. But there wasn't one, so I did what I had to.
No, you have not been through this, because that is a wholly different scenario. There are literally zero similarities between this and that because you were using a shared account. That was completely your own fault. In this case, the children have their own accounts, and Apple is refusing to recognize a court order giving care, custody, and control control of those children to a specific parent. Instead they are arguing that their rules are more important than those of the government, and willfully assisting a parent without CCC of the children with abuse of a custody agreement despite being provided evidence of this CCC.
You could just look up logical fallacies if you are confused about them, x2
Lots of people say they follow various religions but then do none of the things it tells them to do. I don't take people's claims of faith seriously unless they back them up with corresponding action. Depending on surveys to measure faith is ignorant.
"Falling in love makes smoking pot all day look like the ultimate in restraint." -- Dave Sim, author of Cerebrus.
