Cygwin is not at all Linux under Windows. Not only is it not Linux based, but a whole lot of software written on Linux won't even compile for it. That's probably a large part of why WSL exists.

Fleet management has an actual meaning which has nothing to do with enterprise management, which is what the thing you're trying to describe is actually called.

With that said, a lot of shops don't even use Microsoft's enterprise management software, which is weird to me since that just means they're paying for more software. If they're going to do that, why also pay for Windows?

Because edlin is modal.

I had someone spew an AI bullet list about reformations by the new protector of child molesters chosen by the Catholics at me.

I will never take him seriously again.

If you knew me, you'd know I am the one who tells people they don't need an edit button.

"Do you have a citation on the higher CO2 emissions from nuclear fission than wind or solar?"

I'm not providing it to you AGAIN. If you didn't pay attention the first time, there's no point. And I have. Go back and read the last time I wasted time on your disingenuous bullshit.

So you mean, like... edit? Of yore? No mention of it being a reintroduction of a concept gone by?

That sounds unusually competent, and with usefully welcome features.

Yeah, if you guys had done 16 bit support in NTVDM as is available in an OSS replacement for same, you coulda used MS-DOS edit...

You could easily solve it by making the mode clear on the status line, and how to get out of it too, but no need for it to be mode-based anyway.

It's especially impractical to replace them in a way that leaves them destitute. Three meals from a revolution, my guy.

Managers are also cheap, in that they don't want to pay for talent, let alone competence.

I am still rent-free in this clown's head all day every day.

The nuclear playboy clowns are the ones setting the world on fire with their antique technology.

Nuclear has higher lifecycle CO2 emissions than wind or solar, because of site and mining considerations. They're not much higher in absolute terms, but they are much higher in relative ones.

Also, carbon emissions are NOT the only big bad. The reason Nuclear is a dumb answer to the carbon question is that not only are the emissions higher, but nuclear also costs vastly more money, so we could do much more carbon reduction by not using it.

I want an EV when it's feasible but it isn't great for me. There is nowhere to charge at work, I can't charge at home either, the charger in my town is blocks away and after charging I need to move the vehicle so it would be park, walk home, go back later when I'm getting ready for bed and bring the car home. And I also need to be able to afford the vehicle, and in California it wouldn't be any cheaper to drive than my econobox because I can't charge at home where I could maybe install solar or at least wouldn't have to pay for someone to profit from my charger use.

Stop trying to convince people that an EV suits their needs. If you want people to buy EVs, convince policy makers to serve those for whom they will not work.

That's interesting, I wonder how they are filtering the exhaust that will have to exist since the friction material releases gases during braking, and where the dust is stored.

Oh yeah my Camaro had rear drums too. They were aluminum with steel liners, fancy!

The wheel, the inside of the drum, the suspension arms... And on a shitload of trailers where the majority of the brake system is identical to what's on a car in all relevant regards. My Versa has rear drums. I did a full rebuild (including honing cylinders) on a '62 Chevy pickup with four wheel drums. Our bus has drums all around. I know drum brakes, and they release dust. If they were sealed then they would explode due to gases released during braking.