Humanity has survived several ice ages already.

It is about the effect of ending benefits on car sales. Norway did this, and it had the reported effect.

If you want to throw a moral hissy fit anyway, be my guest.

In all countries, where tax credits ended or were reduced, we saw the same pattern: people wanting an EV will buy early to qualify for the expiring tax credit, creating a short boom, and then there will be a period, when only a few people will buy EVs, and then it will normalize again. We had the same in Norway 10 years ago, we had it in Germany two years ago, it will be a short break and then pick up again.

My kettle (completely offline) boils within a minute. There is no need to have water sitting around for hours just to boil it remotely. This is about the time I need to prepare my cup and teapot anyway.

I have two offline clocks, which synchronize automatically with a local LF time signal bacon. Check if you can receive WWVB (or whatever your national equivalent is, in my case, it's DCF77)! A device to build into a standard wall clock is available for ~$15 in your friendly local online shop (ironic, I know).

My TV set is completely offline. I don't know if it is available for you, but it's a DYON Enter, and it works perfectly well. If I want smart features, I have to fire up the BlueRay player, which works, but I barely use it.

That's why the U.S. has about 10 times the number of lawyers per capita than any other country.

I tooked the area of the Flamanville Block 3, France nuclear plant as an example. It's a 1.6 GW plant covering an area of about 1.4 square kilometers. I was rounding it for better calculation.

Again, I was using the Flamanville nuclear plant as an example. Total construction cost was 13 billion Euros.

Please, tell me again, what you believe to know differently.

What point do I want to make?

The point I was to make was that the only thing that speaks for Nuclear is its compact size, and this is a moot point, because I can use areas of land for Solar, which I would otherwise not being able to use (roofs), or which I can continue to use otherwise (farming around wind turbines).

I always like to compare the electricity you could generate from the same piece of land. A nuclear facility usually covers something like 1 square kilometer of land and produces about 1 GW of electricity. The price to build it would be $10 billion. Covering the square kilometer with solar panels will give you about 800 Wp per square meter or 800 MWp, resulting in about 80 MW on average. I can currently buy solar panels for ~$200/sqm. To cover the whole square kilometer would cost me $200 mio. I also could put up 100 wind turbines, giving me about 600 MWp or about 100 MW on average, which would cost me the same $200 mio dollars.

The only thing that speaks for a nuclear reactor is the smaller area footprint. On the other hand, I can't put a nuclear reactor on a roof, nor can I farm the land between the nuclear facilities, which makes the area footprint point moot.

It is. Sorry. And no, Turing's machine did not have to "add goto". In Alan Turing's original paper (Turing 1936), the concept of GOTO does not even make sense, and neither does it in Alonzo Church's lambda-calculus. The Church-Turing hypothesis states, that all functions (yes, we are purely in the realm of Mathematics) that are lamda-defineable, are also Turing calculable.

If something is mathematically inconsistent, it is necessarily logically inconsistent, as Logic is a subset of Mathematics. And an algorithm with lots of if-then-goto structures is still a mathematical algorithm.

This somewhat inconvenient truth was proven by Alan Turing (1927), who proved that everything that is calculable is also calculable by his Universal machine (which can't do anything else than add 1 or subtract 1 or do an if-zero-then-goto), and by Kurt Gödel (1931) with his famous incompleteness theorem, where he proved that any system which contains Arithmetic (and our Universe does) is either not complete or not consistent.

And the physical models of computer games are either incomplete, or they don't contain Arithmetic.

Of course there were realpolitic reasons for the Ukraine to give up their nuclear stockpile.

But "historical claims" are bullshit. In Germany, we have the joke "Germany in the borders of 1244! SSC Napoli is the next German Soccer champion!". Do you think, Lithuania will claim Belarus? Do you dream of a common border between Poland and Türkiye? What if Egypt is ruled again from Baghdad, and the Mongols rule in China? Upstate New York gets returned to the Iroquois?

The nukes were already working, when Ukraine got independent in 1992. They were the old Soviet nukes which happened to be located on Ukrainian territory. In the Budapest agreement, Ukraine voluntarily transferred their nukes to Russia in exchange for Russian warranty to respect Ukrainian autonomy, which President Putin broke in 2014, when he occupied Crimea and staged an uprising in Eastern Ukraine.

Yes, that is called Apocalypticism. It is universal and not a Christian speciality. Christian apocalypticism in the Modern era is an U.S. phenomenon.