Enjoy

(TL/DR: They're *generalizers*. They learn to *generalize* problems.)

No. AI tools are not collagers. That is not how they work.

Yes, they do "learn to think". (albeit in rather alien manners sometimes)

It's not the size of the code. It's the tiny little parts of that code that are most used and least efficient. You might see significant performance improvements with a little custom inline assembly code which don't effectively change the size at all.

However...

"At worst this app should be written in C++/Qt or WX, and should take up about 50MB. " If you wrote this in assembly language, it would probably be under 1 MB. If you care about memory. But 1MB of assembly code is a beast.

"I was once one of them and I thought it was impressive, but absurd to write code in assembly(I still do and I'm not wrong)."

You're situationally wrong. In the most limited cases, or for optimization, it is sometimes necessary and it's absurd to try not to.

Completely different when both are under the Berne Convention? There are differences, but they are for the same primary purposes: rent seeking, ownership, and taxation.

None of our current societies support it being acceptable to have someone else know what you're thinking.

Welcome to fantasy land! No, wait, you should be welcoming us.

Explain why post quality goes up every time AC comments are disallowed.

No, I will not. IDGAF when someone got here, only about the quality of their ideas. I will complain that you're being an ass clown and making shit up, though, because your ideas are crap.

Nonsense. There are a specific set of *mature* Li-ion chemistries - namely, iron phosphate and NCA/NMC. There are no mature Na-ion chemistries. We do not know what kinds, if any, of Na-ion chemistries will mature to be competitive. Current low-volume production is not competitive. There is no non-subsidized Na-ion production that is at all price competitive with li-ion. Manufacturers readily admit this in interviews and quarterly reports. The hope is that with scale and chemistry advancements they will be. The collapse in lithium prices has sapped a lot of the optimism from the market about this.

Only two characters are needed to describe it.

I'll accept the coined word "talenteds". But you are not more "creative" just because you have a talent.

And for the record, most professional musicians today buy riffs or entire backing tracks from others and also outsource the mixing and mastering to third parties, so they can honestly lay off people for outsourcing part of their work to AI.

By "the results", you mean an entirely different, unprotected work?

Doesn't work. Your mislabeled data will stand out like a sore thumb on loss graphs. They'll automated ditch the bad labels, and potentially automated-regenerate new labels.

It's true that's not a differentiator, but they claim to be Christians and all that wealth is the opposite of Christianity.

I asked for a specific thing and you offered me some other thing, then became incensed when I did not accept it. Now you're accusing me of being obtuse, and rude. Womp womp.