Every Republican president, except GW, represented in the Senate article performed better than Obama, and furthermore, Clinton's presidency was during a overwhelmingly Republican-controlled congress. Nor does this take into account how much the national debt has grown under each president to achieve the purported "economic growth." Finally, the tiny sample size makes this a wholly inadequate statistical methodology for drawing conclusions.
I agree that an economic growth pattern started under Obama and has continued through Trump's presidency, but to deny that his policies have continued to facilitate that growth, particularly in the area of reduced unemployment, seems willfully myopic.
No insults, slinking, deflecting or ignoring needed.