Comment Re:Not Flock (Score 1) 122
So far so good? Surely the camera must have given this cop an image of the car that he could see was the wrong colour. It should never have got as far as her apartment.
So far so good? Surely the camera must have given this cop an image of the car that he could see was the wrong colour. It should never have got as far as her apartment.
Huawei was targeted because it was an R&D powerhouse, and all it did was make them redouble their efforts. Sanctions can't do much about patents because if they tried, it would just make other countries invalidate US patents in response.
Apple charges $300 for an additional 512GB of SSD storage on a Macbook Air. So that 12GB is worth $7.
If it's the hidden nature of the camera that you have an issue with, button and other wearable, concealed cameras have been available for years too.
A false positive rate of 10% _among the population of people you arrest_ is acceptable.
I highly disagree. I can understand if Flock's data provided a 10% false positive rate, it's then up the police to do their actual job and gather other evidence to reduce that to near zero before taking any action on that data.
A 10% false arrest rate is criminal. Arrests stick with people even when their is no conviction. Maybe 1 false arrest in 1000 is acceptable in a civilized country without corruption.
I hate when someone gets away with a serious crime, but I'm not going to balance that by lowering the bar for arresting someone.
Well, true. But that's not an excuse to keep repeating the same mistakes.
Should have made Web BASIC.
Javascript's type handling is atrocious, and that's pretty fundamental to a language.
The only way to learn a new programming language is by writing programs in it. - Brian Kernighan