Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Sucks for nerds (Score 0) 44

Nerds aren't being bullied. In fact, nerds are some of the worst bullies ever: they usually pick on smaller kids - often preying on primary school age children - because against any larger opponent they would be torn to pieces. No wonder nerds grow up to be child molesters. What we do to bullies is called a social hygiene operation: we exclude them from society and beat them up in order to enforce their emargination. We don't want those sickos among us. So, we're not bullying them, we're pushing them to the side and away from the Beautiful People.

Comment Re:Question is (Score -1) 157

Or that it's simply as dumb as a brick and would be better off being used as one. Kids are like all other people: some are more or less functioning, a few are intelligent, a very rare few are brilliant, the rest are bricks of dried shit. This is a reality of life, but parents can't accept that their precious little snowflake could be any less than this century's great genius. Once upon a time they would insist it was "misunderstood" or "simply too far ahead" or an "indigo child". Now they're all assburgers.

I wish teachers (those who are worth their salt, and those are in diminishing numbers) would grow a pair and tell the chopparents: "See, your kid is so useless it ought to be recycled as pet food. It's not brilliant, it's not a genius, it's a shit windowlicker. Or rather it would be if it could tell a window from anything else. That's how stupid your shit kid is. Did you try to abort it by any chance?"

Yes, that's the sorry situation. Chopparents who can't accept their subpar progeny is two IQ points too low to be yoghurt so they try to pass them off as smart windowlickers. Guess what: windowlickers aren't smart, or they wouldn't be windowlickers.

Comment Re:We need to attack the addiction angle (Score 1) 120

I read the article. That is really the advanced Zen class.

It's not advanced, I shared it because the headline is clear. The article is written in a confusing way because the author doesn't understand the topic. Another way to say the same thing is, "people are flowers," but that's not exactly precise, either.

This one says things along your thinking, "The Cave You Fear to Enter Holds the Treasure You Seek," but make no mistake, there is a destination and it is reachable.

But since we're at it, What is enlightenment?

Comment Re:How stupid does one need to be? (Score 2) 96

If they had to verify every single detail what would be the point of using the service?

For me, the point is to find sources. If there's a [citation needed], then it has to be treated as unknown.

This is the same as Wikipedia. It's helpful because the internet has gotten less and less searchable, as spam has crept into Google and other search engines.

Slashdot Top Deals

TRANSACTION CANCELLED - FARECARD RETURNED

Working...