You can buy a whole smartphone for the price of that stupid sock.

Good thing this will be running Linux, then.

You can buy a whole actual phone for the price of that ugly-ass bag.

Do you know the way to leave Safeway?
I've been inside so long,
I may go wrong and pass away.
You can't really leave from this Safeway.
I hope that I will find
Some peace of mind outside Safeway.

Lower prices are the magnet,
They can lure you far away from home.
With a drink in your hand you're never alone.
Hours turn into days, how quick they pass.
And all the thieves that never were
Are noshing grapes and passing gas.

If I were going to buy one so that I can play this game, which is the better choice? Which one is newer?

Out of the box, the Xbox Series X is slightly better hardware than the regular PS5. it's not really enough to matter, especially on a mutliplatform game, but since you asked...

That said, Sony offers the PS5 Pro, a higher spec version of the console that Microsoft does not offer an equivalent of. So if price is no object, the PS5 Pro is expected to be the best platform to play it on.

Yes, that's a different device. https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.elgato.com%2Fstream-...

Just use Heroic Games Launcher to run games from Epic and GOG.

You seem to misunderstand. Gnome is the problem.

Because they use Gnome by default.

Microsoft bought the handset division, but Nokia is still a major provider of telecom equipment. (Newer "Nokia" phones are actually HMD using the brand under license.)

Go to about:config
Set keyword.enabled to false

It has everything to do with the screen. If I take content encoded for 1600x900, the upscaling is going to induce more fuzziness on my 1080p display than it is on my 2160p display.

The more raw pixels your display device has, the better you can upscale lower resolution video onto it. For example, if I watch 720p video on a 1080p display, it has to do a 3:2 upscaling and that means that half the scan lines fall in the cracks and cannot be represented adequately. If I'm using a 2160p display, that's a 3:1 upscaling and every third line can correspond to exactly what was fed in. Thin lines won't disappear, and text will remain legible no matter what size it was in the original image. I could also use Nearest Neighbor scaling and get every pixel replicated 9 times over, but it would remain faithful. Similarly, if I feed in a 480p signal from a retro game rig, higher resolution at the screen level means I have more options on how to best emulate a CRT without having to worry about pixel boundaries on the output end.

I want an 8K display in the range of 50 inches so that I have the choice of sitting two feet away and using it as a monitor, or sitting across the room where I admittedly won't care if it's upscaling 1080p video. I don't want to have to own two separate devices to do these jobs, even if the resolution is overkill much of the time. Right now, I use a 27 inch 4K display as my primary monitor but there are times when I really could use two or even four of them. Do I need an 8K TV? No, I realistically don't even need a 4K TV. 1080p is fine there. But that's not the only thing I would want to use a large display for. I don't have room for a dedicated movie watching screen if I've got a 55 inch monitor mounted to a wall, the one device has to do double duty and that means sometimes it's going to be severe overkill for the purpose.

In-car entertainment is a safety hazard and must be eliminated.

Dreamcast was the best system of that generation and deserved a lot more success, I will die on this hill.