There's nothing faster than a skillfully written, monolithic 'C' codebase with just a wee bit of assembly thrown in for those CPU-bound routines.
How monolithic? Does the author of every little utility need to implement their own GUI custom-tailed for the needs of that application? Or are we going to be generous and allow them to statically link in the GUI that comes 'close enough' - uh oh, that sounds like compromise sneaking in.
Beyond GUIs the broader issue is code re-use. The more you can re-use, the more you can focus on what makes your app unique - but the more you'll be bringing in code that wasn't written or optimized for your purpose, and that you don't fully understand. And that's true whether you're linking in a binary library or have the source in your build tree. There's just not enough time in the world to study and fully comprehend and tailor all the code for even a moderately complex application from the ground up.
It may sound 'wasteful' but sometimes a simple answer takes a lot of reasoning or processing to come up with, and a bare LLM (even a deep one) has a rather limited ability to reason in only a single pass. What you're getting there is just a first draft.
But some, I think, believe The Donald and other conspiracy theories because during Covid I heard about people who got Covid and went to their deaths saying things like, 'I am not dying of Covid. Covid is not real.' That's the message they chose to send to their families. Not 'you should get the vaccine and avoid crowded spaces.' Is that not a True Believer?
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Feducationdata.org%2Fnumb...
Have to wonder if demand has kept pace with that huge increase in supply.
People are always talking about how great college students had it in the 1960's. But you have to realize that was a very small, select (not necessarily by merit) population of college students back then. Grant some privilege to everybody, and it tends to dilute the value of it.
But secondly, you cannot deny that Trump has a lot of really adamant supporters who would vote for him over anybody else you can name. Not grudgingly. In fact they automatically believe anything he says, which is quite a feat.
It seems our idea of the mean, is meaningless.
The median is slightly more meaningful, as you are assured there is at least one sample in your set having that exact value,
China has reached a kind of crossroads where they need some kind of transformation.
The usual answer being that China needs to increase internal consumption, becoming more of a consumer-oriented economy.
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcarnegieendowment.org%2F...
What I don't understand is why this is hard to do. Don't people love to spend money and increase their standard of living? Better food, nicer transport, more clothes. Then Uber Eats and a couple jet skis and a big towing vehicle. As an American the, concept of people not wanting to join the rat race, or being too principled to do so, is really foreign to me.
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nintendo.com%2Fus%2Fwh...
Raising prices on existing hardware is pretty rare in tech. Moore's outlaw?
Games, ok, that's a labor-driven thing. Nobody thinks the cost of the dvd media or download bandwidth are driving the price.
Just if one other person had won they would have still lost a bit of money. It would be hilarious if two groups did it at the same time, guaranteeing record profits for the state lottery, and also guaranteeing that both groups lose more money than they win.
They spent around $24.5M on tickets (assuming they were able to keep the 5% sales commission), took home $57.8M (the lump-sum payout of the $95M pool).
If one other person had won each winner would take home $28.9M, still a small net profit.
The computer is to the information industry roughly what the central power station is to the electrical industry. -- Peter Drucker