Comment Re:Its almost like (Score 1) 180
It seems our idea of the mean, is meaningless.
The median is slightly more meaningful, as you are assured there is at least one sample in your set having that exact value,
It seems our idea of the mean, is meaningless.
The median is slightly more meaningful, as you are assured there is at least one sample in your set having that exact value,
Just if one other person had won they would have still lost a bit of money. It would be hilarious if two groups did it at the same time, guaranteeing record profits for the state lottery, and also guaranteeing that both groups lose more money than they win.
They spent around $24.5M on tickets (assuming they were able to keep the 5% sales commission), took home $57.8M (the lump-sum payout of the $95M pool).
If one other person had won each winner would take home $28.9M, still a small net profit.
In college we explored replication the GPS algorithm, your final calculation would always give you two position fixes -- one in space, the other within the earth's atmosphere. Your algorithm would discard the orbital result and return the second answer.
Scratch that, reverse it, and you've got your answer for a lunar fix
I’m wondering why the 2A crowd is so silent on Hunter Biden...
See also: Philando Castile.
The reason your self-constructed strawman suggests is just your personal biases showing, not the NRA's. Rather Castile's case and Biden's had one thing in common -- the person at the center of the case was a drug user. Also the NRA rarely has much to say about law enforcement shootings, regardless of the ethnicity of the victim
OTOH, " the 2A crowd" (which is a lot larger than the NRA) did actually have quite a bit to say about Castile and about Hunter, yet were mostly ignored by the major media.
Hell, the whole "bad coffee" trope is because traditionally workplaces used economy brand coffee.
The "free" coffee at my former Fortune-500's office kept declining in quality, at one point our jump server had "ping" aliased to set a payload of 4BAD0FF1CEC0FFEE.
It was almost a relief when they stopped providing free coffee on each floor, instead of taking a 1 minute detour to pour a cup, the whole team would troop down to buy some actually good coffee across the street at Intelligentsia, where sometimes we'd get to chatting with the competition...
Nothing stops the automaker from also offering voice control as an option, but there are some controls which it just makes sense to have direct hotbutton access.
Some things, you really do want a button for. If I'm looking to turn down the radio or turn off the mixing of outside air, I don't want to have a conversation with my car to accomplish those basic tasks.
Ward was a classy and innovative man, and will be missed.
Randy Suess was also a man.
That said, there is another case, which I can't find, where the woman was abused by her husband/boyfried by him beating her and dragging her by her hair, she kills him, and now she's going to jail.
There are a couple of such cases in the news, the key factor in each being that, at the moment she killed him, she was not in fact in immediate danger of death of grievous bodily harm. Sometimes the woman is acquitted by a sympathetic jury, other times convicted. In one example of the former, Marcia Thompson, a 44-year-old U.S. Customs agent, shot her husband in the back while he lay unarmed on the living room couch, then walked free.
Stealing from apartment-style "cluster mailboxes" is much more lucrative as you only need to get past one lock (or steal a master "arrow" key) and you have access to all the mail and packages in the cluster.
The PO Boxes inside a post office are each keyed uniquely and do not have a master key. It is much more difficult & risky to gain access to the backside to loot the boxes en masse, as that is within the "secure" side of the post office. You'd pretty much have to be a USPS employee to successfully and repeatedly steal mail and packages from within a post office. I strongly doubt anybody is getting away with raking open multiple boxes inside a post office, assuming those locks are even that easy to open
More recently, 66% of Americans don't think they could cover a month of living expenses in an emergency.
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.usatoday.com%2Fstory...
Next time, just use the 'in the past year' tool when doing a google search. Stories from 2019--pre-pandemic!--don't really have much credibility in 2024.
When you dig into that "66%" Bankrate survey, the original quote is "Only 44% of U.S. adults would pay an emergency expense of $1,000 or more from their savings", which doesn't mean the same thing as "couldn't cover a month of living expenses".
Depending on how the survey cast the "emergency savings" question, I'd answer differently, as it becomes a question not of assets, but liquidity.
Bard/Gemini has been demonstrated to edit user prompts to include "diversity" language in the prompt before the AI engine receives the prompt.
For example, wrote a prompt for "draw a picture of a fantasy medieval festival with people dancing and celebrating", the response was "Sure, here's a picture of a fantasy medieval festival with people of various genders and ethnicities dancing and celebrating."
There are other examples of Bard rewriting prompts to inject specific races and genders. That isn't training data, that's Google intentionally adding a pre-parser and rewrite engine to steer the results away from the customer's prompt.
If you leave your car unlocked and with the key in the ignition, ready to be taken and used for nefarious means, yes, you will get into trouble. If you let your gun lay around and someone takes it to shoot someone, you will most certainly get into trouble.
You are required to keep your belongings safe and secure. Failure to do so will result in you getting into quite uncomfortably hot water.
Perhaps -- but you would not face charges for the specific crime of "aiding and abetting".
For the example of leaving your car unlocked, you'd only have legal trouble if you proceeded to file a fraudulent insurance claim, and in many states would not incur any tort liability
Second, hope that you're not up against a lawyer who equates your open access point to leaving a car unlocked and with the key in the ignition that is then used by a criminal for his crime, because that is aiding and abetting, which would carry a quite similar sentence as the original crime here.
[Citation Needed]
The crime of "aiding and abetting", in any sane nation (and in the USA) has a mandatory component of mens rea.
If you left your front door open and someone wandered into your house and stole a gun or a knife and then committed a crime using said object, you would be liable if you didn't immediately report the theft though.
The mandatory reporting in federal law applies to FFLs (registered commercial dealers) only.
Individuals are not held criminally liable for the actions of thief, regardless of what was stolen -- a car, a knife, a gun or a porn stash. With firearms specifically, federal law protects owners in the event of a stolen weapon.
California and the handful of other states with a "gun theft reporting law" generally do not explicitly impose civil liability for the actions of the thief, though California is moving in that direction. There are proposals, like LA's SB216 to make owners liable even if they do report in a timely manner, but these are long shots at best and unlikely to survive a court challenge.
We were so poor we couldn't afford a watchdog. If we heard a noise at night, we'd bark ourselves. -- Crazy Jimmy