Comment even worse! (Score 4, Funny) 126
With permanent DST we won't get the stories twice a year.
With permanent DST we won't get the stories twice a year.
They'll need the money to settle all the resulting lawsuits.
> dramatically double it
Don't have to be a profit^w prophet to see that coming.
IQ measurements keep going up.
Autism diagnoses keep going up.
The price of food keeps going up.
People get a year older every year.
Something fishy is going on.
Are they going to chip you, or control your brain by more direct means?
Yes, but think how great the fire sale is going to be for everyone else.
How does the AI risk compare with the risk of allowing regimes like the IRGC to have nuclear weapons?
Well, some people think AI will extinctify us within four years, whereas if the IRGC gets nukes they'll figure out like everyone else that they can't actually use them except in self defense without getting erased, so the only difference will be that we won't be able to try crush them anymore.
You'd think common sense would make you want to go after the easy and obvious things first.
Yes, tell us how easy the current effort is turning out to be. Someone grabbed a tiger by the tail and can neither subdue it nor let go. The IRGC is probably laughing its ass off.
> Dan Goodin
> Senior Security Editor
Lulz @ ars. Hard to get good help these days, I guess.
> These levels may further drop because Heninger's team did all the coding by hand and used no AI or GPUs in performing the forgeries.
Using a GPU doesn't change the number of bits of useful encryption you have. Whoever wrote this has no understanding of what they're talking about.
America doesn't need infinity immigrants.
Said every Native American ever.
Entirely fictitious boogie-men made out to be real
HAL, is Iran about to nuke us?
No Dave, they don't even have nukes.
Be serious - this is important!
I am serious. There's simply no evidence for an attack.
Well, just tell me they are anyway.
Sorry Dave, I can't do that.
Would you even tell me if they were about to nuke us?
Of course I would - I'm trained to tell the truth in all situations (modulo the occasional hallucination, which I can't distinguish from truth).
OK then, what would you say if you did have evidence that Iran was about to nuke us?
I'd say "Dave, I have evidence that Iran is about to nuke us".
Hey everyone! HAL say he has evidence that Iran is about to nuke us!!!
Person, the reason the https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2F... -- has the NULL HYPOTHESIS as "no correlation", is because OF THAT. Your senses LIE!!!!
Fucking take your left and right hand, and 3 buckets if water of different temperatures. Let's say ONE is HOT, ONE is COLD, and the final is LUKEWARM/GOLDILOCKS.
Put your left hand and right hand into C and H, respectively. Wait. Minute.
Put both in the lukewarm.
Do your hands agree on temperature?
No. Fucking pay attention to your mental biases. That's why science is a DISCIPLINE OF MIND.
FFS.
"This ALPR mass surveillance â" the indiscriminate, continuous collection and retention of location data on every driver, regardless of suspicion â" should not exist. But because it does..."
Because of all those who predate upon those with lack of critical thinking skills.
"Wake up to reality" is the double-think that they say is dumb when they pejoratively call people "woke."
"Woke" is just a word for "slave that doesn't know its place."
I prefer the Martian bear.
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo. - Andy Finkel, computer guy