> dramatically double it

> Dan Goodin
> Senior Security Editor

Lulz @ ars. Hard to get good help these days, I guess.

> These levels may further drop because Heninger's team did all the coding by hand and used no AI or GPUs in performing the forgeries.

Using a GPU doesn't change the number of bits of useful encryption you have. Whoever wrote this has no understanding of what they're talking about.

when you drop all pretext of argument the topic and instead argue a misspelling you've lost. BAD.

Yes, I'm saying if they follow the processes PROSCRIBE BY SOCIETY that they shouldn't be sent to jail.

Step 1: engage your brain

Step 2: maybe comment

Do you want to be a judge for mediocre pay and the chance to go to prison for following the rules that are set forth for you to follow?

DID YOU THINK ABOUT THIS AT ALL BEFORE YOU GOT MAD?

Yes. There's no reason to force people who don't want one to buy one.

Like it doesn't make any sense. What does "ownership" do?

All software is licensed.

and they'd have to pay income tax to raise the money to pay the wealth tax, too, so its' a double whammy.

While I'm generally OK with this we need to change the rules to stop them from accruing the wealth to begin with.

on the grid. Use stationary batteries that you can replace without throwing out the car with it.

"quality discussion"

I agree. I just don't find reddit to be that. It's all very confident echo chambers.

It's crazy how many AI responses i get that source reddit posts as a source of truth.

bothers me.

There is an unexplained phenomena and this "dark matter" and "dark energy" is just a made up explanation for that. There is no evidence it exists. No experiments we've done show that it exists and as far as I know there aren't even any proposed experiments that just need funding that are likely to show it exists.

Saying a galaxy is 99.9% something that we have no clue if even exists seems insane.

It's like string theory. Just made up stuff that is just tuned as needed to match measurements. It's like a god of the gaps - it's constantly adjusted to match experimental data.

I can see google/apple having a problem with "free" apps that people want to host and have installed from official app stores and then only allow behind the scenes payment where google/apple don't get a cut.

Presumably google/apple will have a rule for this where you're charged a certain amount for pushing new versions (which require validation) and per-install costs that would be offset by payment %'s that those companies take.

And then hopefully they're still good for truly free apps.

excuse me?