... when things go dramatically wrong. There is no way Apple is unable to make an LLM on the level of most other players at this time.

Scene: a queue of customers in a shop. Customer at the head of the queue with a total of $19.10, hands the cashier a $20 note to pay. There is no till just an electronic card reader and a cash drawer.

A frown appears on the cashier's face as the sudden realization that skills learned in their "advanced" maths class will now be called on after years of neglect. They reach for the calculator only to remember that the batteries died this morning and nobody has had a chance to replace them. Concentrating hard finally an epiphany - $19 is just $1 less than $20 so they quickly hand the customer a dollar.

But no, the customer hands it back saying this is too much change. Panic sets in as the cashier realizes that they had forgotten the decimal place! How can they be expected to do university-level maths? They don't have a maths degree! Faint wisps of steam rise from their ears as mathematical machinery deep in their brain rumbles into action straining against the buildup of forgotten Tiktok videos and What's App messages. Finally, seemingly from nowhere comes the answer - it's 90 cents! With a flash of relief the cashier opens the cash draw only to be confronted with 25, 10 and 5 cent coins and a new seemingly impossible puzzle of how to choose the right coins to make up 90 cents....

My takeaway is that given the wonerful level fo maths education we now seem to have, sadly even cash transactions require working technology today.

Indeed, it does. Excellent.

Nope. But people like you have been proven to be of massive negative worth.

You make a rational and convincing argument. Unfortunately the person you answer to is not rational. They just want to find _something_ so that they can blame somebody else and continue to not change anything about their own life. These people are a core part of the problem.

So? Does that make climate change disappear or be less of a catastrophe? No, it does not. Seriously, how stupid are you?

Ah, yes, speak truth, get modded troll. No idea how some fuckups get mod-points time and again.

You were just moving the goalposts. Which is a scummy and fundamentally dishonest thing to do. Want to add a bit of whataboutism to that or maybe some bikeshedding?

Quite true. And many of those easy to manipulate mistakenly think they are hard or impossible to manipulate. Makes them excellent victims.

Also refer to https://f6ffb3fa-34ce-43c1-939d-77e64deb3c0c.atarimworker.io/story/25/...

Indeed. Also refer to https://f6ffb3fa-34ce-43c1-939d-77e64deb3c0c.atarimworker.io/story/25/...

They didn't get anything in exchange for this action in addition to what they already had. All they got was americans agreeing that they will continue negotiations Trump stopped two days ago in response to this law. And Americans likely added a few more points to the agenda limiting taxation capabilities of Canadian state.

So all that happened is that Trump just called another bluff. This was a Canadian mistake similar to one Trump made when he stated memeing about annexing Canada, getting a much less friendly government elected there.

Some things you need to actually hold back on until ink is on the paper.

Porn industry embraced it wholeheartedly.

What you found is a one of a tiny handful of accounts that is trying to differentiate by saying "look I'm not doing what everyone else is doing". This is why it emphasizes "this creator". The entire selling point is that everyone has already gone for AI.

First, by current Physics, thermal noise is deterministic. And second, it makes a difference for the mechanism of the proof. Hence your argument is nonsense.
And as a side-note, nobody actually knows whether putting in true randomness (by currently known Physics reserved for quantum effects) would make a difference or not. My proof would certainly not work for that scenario though.

Nope. I guess you lack experience with proof theory or are not smart enoug to see what the claim actually is.

No. It is a proof. It leaves open what the meachanism is and for sure there is none in currently known Physics. The one doing "mysticism" here is you by ascribing properties to known mechanisms which they do not have.