Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Past time (Score 1) 68

And echo cancelling. The speaker and the mic are right next to each other. And multi-channel compression. And noise reduction. And beam forming of multiple microphones. All on a DSP that is small enough to fit inside your ear and run off battery. And configurable and tunable to meet individual differences.

Comment Re:What happens when they're gone? (Score 1) 199

I've yet to meet a "Rockstar" that followed any sort of process. I've been in the embedded world for 15 years, and I can churn out code that mostly works in almost no time. Churning out code that is modular, reusable, will survive system test, third party security reviews, deployment to a wide variety of field conditions on potentially out of spec hardware, and give a path to debugging when its not working is a whole different matter. Once I create that code, I need to communicate and document all of this. I guess I probably don't look so Rockstar after I spend the time to do all this. Even when I do this really well, and fast, I can only do so much as a single person. I also don't want a 60 hour work to be a normal thing. If I can empower a team of 5-10 people to do this almost as well as I can, that's where the real multiplicative power comes in. The Rockstar isn't the person who churns out code fast, its the person that raises the level of an entire team. Anybody that tells you otherwise is a business type who has never been in the trenches and experienced it first hand.

Comment Not here to stay (Score 2) 59

So the wife and I used this service twice. Both times we got maybe 2/3 of what we wanted. Most of the substitutions made were pretty wrong. Two cans of baking powder was substituted for a box of baking mix, fresh bone in chicken for frozen boneless skinless chicken breasts. stir fry sauce for General Tso sauce, wonton wrappers for egg roll wrappers, etc., etc. A bit annoying, but even more annoying is that I'm paying the somewhat inflated prices of groceries already due to Coronavirus, then I'm paying a fee to the store, and then I feel compelled to tip because of how bad these companies are screwing these gig economy workers. It makes my groceries 20-30% more expensive for me to not get what I want. Just not a good long term solution. So after our last order, we decided no more.

This virus will pass given time, masks help some, eventually we will all be exposed to it and we will go back to stores. We need this to happen at a rate our hospitals can support, so I support the lock down (and was one of the first people I know to go into quarantine). But we don't need to draw it out any further than the rate our hospitals can support.

Also, we are a country of temporarily displaced millionaires who think they are one life change from being rich. The reality is that we are a country of mostly poor people with a few staggering wealthy people that we see in the media driving our perception of the world. Most Americans simply don't make enough money to pay someone else to do their shopping.

Comment Re:Locks should be done by Lock companies (Score 1) 59

Agreed. There are standards and practices for validating both physical and IoT security. Some two bit startup doesn't have the resources or process in place to take these steps. A large company that has a reputation to protect does. Nobody wants to be on the front page of Slashdot or CNN or some industry newsletter with a vulnerability.

Also, brand names have a wide variety of quality levels. It should be no surprise that a $1500 lock on a custom steel door with a reinforced door jam is much more secure than a $69 electronic lock attached to a foam core door with two screws and a wood jam. A determined attacker will get through either, but one will take a much longer amount of time and tools.

Submission + - People Older Than 65 Share the Most Fake News, Study Finds (theverge.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Older Americans are disproportionately more likely to share fake news on Facebook, according to a new analysis by researchers at New York and Princeton Universities. Older users shared more fake news than younger ones regardless of education, sex, race, income, or how many links they shared. In fact, age predicted their behavior better than any other characteristic — including party affiliation. Today’s study, published in Science Advances, examined user behavior in the months before and after the 2016 US presidential election. In early 2016, the academics started working with research firm YouGov to assemble a panel of 3,500 people, which included both Facebook users and non-users. On November 16th, just after the election, they asked Facebook users on the panel to install an application that allowed them to share data including public profile fields, religious and political views, posts to their own timelines, and the pages that they followed. Users could opt in or out of sharing individual categories of data, and researchers did not have access to the News Feeds or data about their friends.

About 49 percent of study participants who used Facebook agreed to share their profile data. Researchers then checked links posted to their timelines against a list of web domains that have historically shared fake news, as compiled by BuzzFeed reporter Craig Silverman. Later, they checked the links against four other lists of fake news stories and domains to see whether the results would be consistent. Across all age categories, sharing fake news was a relatively rare category. Only 8.5 percent of users in the study shared at least one link from a fake news site. Users who identified as conservative were more likely than users who identified as liberal to share fake news: 18 percent of Republicans shared links to fake news sites, compared to less than 4 percent of Democrats. The researchers attributed this finding largely to studies showing that in 2016, fake news overwhelmingly served to promote Trump’s candidacy. But older users skewed the findings: 11 percent of users older than 65 shared a hoax, while just 3 percent of users 18 to 29 did. Facebook users ages 65 and older shared more than twice as many fake news articles than the next-oldest age group of 45 to 65, and nearly seven times as many fake news articles as the youngest age group (18 to 29).

Comment Re:... Says the Frenchman (Score 1) 711

Since i am a Greek, when communicating with Barbarians like you i am forced to use a Barbaric language (in my case the -common among Barbarians- language called English) instead of the language of the Gods: Greek!

I've known several Greeks over the years, and all of them have said basically this to me at some point.

Slashdot Top Deals

"I've seen the forgeries I've sent out." -- John F. Haugh II (jfh@rpp386.Dallas.TX.US), about forging net news articles

Working...