Comment Re:Wow combining two useless things I hate (Score 1) 120
But hey, it's a free country...you do you.
I don't see any compelling reason to change a lifetime of behavior for no perceived value, and add inconvenience to my daily life.
But hey, it's a free country...you do you.
I don't see any compelling reason to change a lifetime of behavior for no perceived value, and add inconvenience to my daily life.
Where I am...each house has 1 or more general garbage cans...but plastic things, uniform size and shape....and on trash days (2 a week) you wheel the "bin" out to the road side....the truck comes along and a big mechanical arm picks up each can and dumps it in...
There's no garbage men there to even look at what you're throwing out.
On a different day of the week, I do see folks putting out their small recycle bins, the ones that want to participate.
To save money, they've set up this system so that we don't have 2-3 guys hanging on the back of each garbage truck grabbing each can and dumping it...there's pretty much just 1 person driving the truck and the truck grabs, dumps and returns each can....
Again, I don't have anything against recycling....but participation is and should be optional...where I live.
Johnny Fever on WKRP.
"When everyone is out to get you, paranoid is just....
LOL....oh, don't forget the Phone Cops!!
You can if you want...but you are free to decide if you want to bother or not.
We don't have any "trash police" here....we've got better things to spend our tax dollars on.
I'm kind of mystified by the absolute visceral hostility of a large number of Americans towards recycling.
I think it has to do with some cities actually forcing people to recycle....where they actually go through what you throw out and fine you...?
Thankfully I've never lived anywhere like that, but I'd be pissed if that were the case.
I'm glad people that want to do that can....I have nothing against it, but being forced to is another thing entirely.
I don't have room in my kitchen for 3x different cans to sort and throw shit out....nor the patience or time to bother.
But I support those that wish to do so....
If you want to throw pretty much anything in the trash here, they'll take it, no questions asked.
For example, a touchscreen is nearly a requirement for decent GPS UI. There are applications where the multitouch gestures are hard to beat for the UI.
I have a phone for that....no need for another one on car touchscreen that will eventually age out....
I want physical controls...the ones on the central console of the old days worked great, I could do most everything by feel or if I had to look...1-2 second glance.....
I don't want a fucking ipad to control everything when I'm driving a car, especially at higher speeds...
I don't want to unsubscribe to this or that.
I want to give natural language filters like "I never want to see a political email again, from anyone"
Or maybe "If they make it sound urgent but it's not urgent at all, don't show it to me and remind me a week before the actual deadline if it's at all important".
As others have said, unsubscribe links often do not work and it's probably all the Gmail feature will use.
Now McEnroe would complain "You must be hallucinating!"
Then the AI umpire would agree. And when the opponent appealed for the original ruling, the umpire would agree again.
This is a bunch of BS. I'm doing very well and my daily driver is a 15yo Ford Escape. Stick shift at that...
/. autists like us are the exception. Most people, if given the disposable income will spend it on something flashy with depreciating value instead of a solid investment like Magic The Gathering Cards.
LLM crawlers are understandable these days, but who on earth is actively trying to take the FSF down?
A bunch of heathen VIM users trying to stop people from accessing EMACS? What the heck?
Let's say you actually managed to take down the FSF website. Who would even notice or care? How would that help your hacker rep in any way? You'd be a laughingstock for making the attempt.
I was going to post a very similar comment: these people are not coders but they are project managers, and they are "employing" AI as their coding employees.
The thing is - there's "nobody" to take credit for the work, so the manager gets credit for something they didn't do. So it's definitely a skill and is work, but it isn't "coding" at all.
It's an interesting world - the AI is an extremely inexpensive employee and has enough skill to displace increasingly higher-skill tiers of actual software engineering and programming.
If I was running these hackathons, I would disallow AI or I would allow people to hire "code-as-a-service" people. Those seem functionally equivalent activities, just with AI being vastly easier to manage the logistics and you don't have to pay employment taxes or benefits to the AI.
It's no wonder there is so much tension about the many uses of AI - instead of hiring people to do work, it's another instance of paying to use a machine to do work at a price point lower than paying people.
"Paul Lynde to block..." -- a contestant on "Hollywood Squares"