Well, there are some really bad comedy skits on YouTube that feature Spirit. But, beyond that, no, I can't think of anything tech-related about it. And that includes their aircraft.
Is X number 1 in the world got news? No.
Should it be? No.
Is that relevant as to whether Grok is any good? No.
Is Grok any good? No.
Now that's cleared up...
Honestly, I don't know why Snap is even a thing. Yes, you can roll back to a previous version, but if they'd simply used NILFS2, they could have done exactly the same thing without using anything like as much disk space or complexity.
The article is plausible, LLMs have indeed no semantic understanding or concept of logic.
LLMs can be very effective at spotting inconsistencies, dubious reasoning, and design flaws, but you really really have to work hard at it and do a fair amount of the heavy lifting yourself. LLMs, on their own, are worse engineers than Sinclair Research or Microsoft. And that takes some doing.
Even with significant human input, what they produce is likely to be messy and really requires heavy review before use.
Some of you will remember that I've been setting these AI LLMs a serious engineering challenge. Six months of near-constant iterations and there are still hundreds of issues and it's unclear if the design it has come up with is remotely workable. I've got the project up on github, if anyone wants to amuse themselves.
That version is consistent with what I know about Japanese culture and the USSR's involvement. I'm far more inclined to believe it.
Bombing civilians, even in western nations, has never been effective. In Britain, we don't talk about the Blitz Panic, if the Blitz is referred to at all, it is in the context of unifying the nation's resolve.
Why, then, in a culture that put honour above all else, the emperor above all people, and the military over all mindsets, would bombing a city have any different effect? It's obvious from the firestorms created by the US that it hadn't done, and it astonishes me to this day that the US expected any other result.
I'm shocked! Shocked I say!.... well, not that shocked.
The idea that someone can just throw a crap-ton of random data into a system, have it generate a statistically connected node network, and that anything it outputs will be meaningful? Yeah, that's pretty much delusional in itself.
It would be amazing if there was a document that stated in very clear terms just how limited our federal government is and what it can't do at all no matter what.
"13. Global thermonuclear war."
Would you like to play a nice game of Chess?
" exactly like the people voted for!"
The people didn't vote FOR anything, IMO. Way too many voted against something.
People didn't like Biden *OR* Harris. They held their nose and voted AGAINST Trump. Unsuccessfully
Many Trump voters likewise didn't like Trump, but voted AGAINST Harris.
Both parties are providing crap candidates.
Hydrogen does not make a good fuel, tor a tonne of reasons, but nitrogen fuel would be less prone to nasty reactions and fewer problems. Could N6 combustion be controlled at levels suitable for heavy road vehicles or trains?
(Electric trains have their own problems, due to the fact that the junction needs to be poor and the cost of copper is so great that lines need to use far worse conductors to reduce theft.)
Since we're not taking about infinitesimals, I fail to see the relevance.
The Raspberry Pi was connected to the same network switch used by the bank’s ATM system...
Probably simple social engineering. Show up in an outfit that looks like you're an electrician or something else... or just pay a bank employee to let them in and look the other way...
You are correct. That's precisely how MWI is thought to work.
The premise of the argument is that, to conserve superposition information, you would necessarily need to prove that it would be grouped with information QM requires to be conserved, when viewed in a space that permitted it to be conserved. If it isn't, then there's no mechanism to preserve it, so no MWI.
"The hands that help are better far than the lips that pray." -- Robert G. Ingersoll
