From the AI@Purdue page: "Beginning in fall of 2026, we will implement an AI working competency graduation requirement through an expanded partnership with Google."
Prior to its approval by the Purdue Board of Trustees, Purdue President Mung Chiang and CEO of Google Public Sector Karen Dahut announced plans to introduce the new working AI competency graduation requirement in mid-November at the 2025 Google-Purdue AI Summit.
At a Sept. 2025 White House meeting, Google CEO Sundar Pichai committed $3 million to Code.org, the tech-backed nonprofit that is working towards a goal of requiring "all students to earn credit for an AI and CS course for high school graduation."
The point of schooling is that people understand the subject matter and prepare themselves for employment where deadlines exist. I agree that an extra half an hour for a test is not unreasonable, but I will posit that this fails to prepare students for employment in the real world. Employers do not have to reasonably accommodate disabilities that make someone unable to do the job. I literally can't hire someone who takes 50% longer to complete tasks and therefore cannot complete them on time, because the deadlines are the deadlines.
This is not armchair psychology. This is harsh reality. Students need to learn to complete tasks and achieve goals under inflexible time constraints.
start your engines!
RFK's first order of business at EPA would probably be to ban Dihydrogen Monoxide, Hydrogen Hydroxide, Hydroxyl Acid, and other dangerous chemicals.
Since when does the public health matter when there are corporate profits at stake?
"Amazon Future Engineer is a comprehensive childhood-to-career program aimed at increasing access to computer science education for students from underserved and underrepresented communities."
First saw something like this 30+ years ago - someone grabbed a list of publicly available userIDs from the company's email system and apparently either manually or using a keyboard macro simply tried multiple times to logon with an incorrect password to lock out the entire company's thousands of user and team IDs. The company used mainframe systems/databases with centralized passwords, so didn't take long at all (not even 30 minutes, IIRC) to get everyone back in business. One imagines that such a simple 'attack' - essentially the same as what the guy did some 30 years later in 2021 - would wreak a lot more havoc in today's world with its overwhelmingly-complicated intertwined security layers, which are further compounded by the need to get consensus from a number of parties - e.g., security, risk, compliance, governance, operations, legal - that it's safe to reopen things for business even after a fix is identified. It seems part of this guy's hefty sentence is likely attributable to businesses relying on systems and infrastructure and bureaucracy that are vulnerable to and unable to recover quickly from even trivial 'attacks' like this that leave systems and data untouched, no?
Of course, the correct way to do this is to pass a Federal Law regulating AI, and then using the supremacy clause of the Constitution to set aside State laws that conflict with it.
But, Trump has never been one to do things in the Constitutional way. He just things that EOs are "rule by decree" even if they're not.
Think of your family tonight. Try to crawl home after the computer crashes.