Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Your Body is Your Most Sincere Intellectual Pro (Score 1) 42

You really are an ideologue. You have no idea what "far left" actually means, but from your point of view - fascist - everything to the left of Faux Noise is "far left".

Your opinion, without facts, is meaningless.

FACT: Canadians I know consider most Dems on Congress would fit comfortably in their CONSERVATIVE Tory party.

I, an actual socialist, don't qualify as "far left", but how 'bout we nationalize all electric companies, and the grids?

I'm both an ideally and have no idea what far left means. Are you An AI hallucinating? IO see you have provided so many facts. I hope you are an AI hallucinating, because parsing your screed shows a lot of contradictions.

Comment Re:Your Body is Your Most Sincere Intellectual Pro (Score 1) 42

"Extreme far left"... where "far left" is anything short of the outright fascism of the US right and extreme far left is the rest of the world's moderate. Fuck off. Don't need to lie about right wing extremism to make the point there's a bunch of rich hypocrites in Hollywood.

You are going to be disappointed, I shall not "Fuck off"

Why do people like you demand others not express an opinion, or to compel our speech, or just be gagged.

I'm not"right wing" I'm centered, and don't think there is not right wing extremism.

And don't think there isn't left wing extremism. Like you.

Rather than your hateful demand for my silence when I fuck off, Maybe a respectful "I disagree, then have a discussion. Are you capable? I can provide cites, But perhaps telling a person to shut off is the zenith of your ability?

Comment Re:Your Body is Your Most Sincere Intellectual Pro (Score 3, Insightful) 42

One of the more appalling things I've seen in the US on this stuff is people saying "Well actors are so well paid why should we care". The thing is theres a very very tiny number of actors that are paid well, the stars. But the vast majority, and the ones currently being sold by the AI firms as being replacable by AI, are background actors and bitpart actors and these are the guys who MIGHT be getting $30K a year if they are in regular work, and more likely far far less

One of the interesting things that comes to mind, after the extreme far left lurch of Hollywood in recent years, is why the big stars that make millions per film, do not agitate for better pay for those that get paid only a pittance. I mean, they should be all about income equity, one would think.

Comment Re:Rather pointless. (Score 1) 42

People will often pick a movie or tv show because of one or more actors in it, because they enjoy their work. Some shows with a bunch of no-names succeed, but let's be honest, star power is a thing. If you steal that star power from actors, what do they have left?

Same as the rest of us, I suppose.

I think that these "stars" should be very concerned. Because already the ones that exist now, have a "last generation" vibe going on. Unless they somehow make it illegal to use AI actors at all, when they die out, so does the "star concept". They'll age out, and few if any new will come along.

Comment Re:Start paying people normal salaries (Score 1) 207

So he admits that he not only agrees there will be inflation, but he encourages it - he says that it would be worth it.

Yes, if you can't really grasp how that's possible then we're just spinning wheels. Merry Christmas.

I see.

Maybe that wasn't you who wrote:

"I am not saying prices don't go up but they definitely don't go up anywhere near in proportion to the purchasing power of the class of folks this helps the most.

A quick analysis shows they'll likely be around the same place. However, you just show you don't want an adult conversation.

Comment Re: Stop being a sponsor. (Score 1) 207

My point is restaurants can be cheap and still provide good service. It's sad that you can only get that here in the States if you can afford to tip 100%.

Can you point to the place that I wrote that you must tip at 100 percent? I wrote that my tipping level - which I use as a way to get some-money in the hands of those who might not be as fortunate, results in some element of gratitude.

But since we're here, does your Your esteemed Japanese restaurant - which you seem to believe gives you the same level of service I get at 100 percent tipping Do they watch for you, and have your drinks and table ready before you get there?

Do they do extra for you? It really isn't the same thing. Regular tippers get regular service.

It's also sad that you can't seem to grasp such a simple concept without me spelling it out explicitly.

Almost as sad as you turning this into yet another anti American screed, that you seem to think that you get the same level of service as I do by my being generous. then again, your narrative of anti Americanism is showing. Anyhow, move to Japan, where you don't have to tip. If that is what makes you happy, then I might even spring for the airfare.

By the way, this isn't just Japan. France, Italy, Mexico just to name a few. Only American servers threaten you with shitty service if you don't tip the expected amount (which also increases by 5% every few years).

Oh grow up. Can you tell me where and who said that you get shitty service if you don't tip enough? You're having arguments with me in your head.

But here's the thing comrade, I really do not care that every other country has. They are sovereign countries, they have their own laws. This is what we have here, and our waitstaff are actually doing okay.

Wanna know what I would do if I was eating in Japan? I'd give the waiter/waitress a minimum 100 percent of the bill tip - Bastard that I am.

You're so bitter and full of hate that you actually get spun up about a person that tips well. Or maybe you aren't but you are acting like a person who is bitter and full of hate acts.

As I noted, I have done well in life monetarily, and I enjoy spreading the money around. If I spend 200 dollars on a meal, the server gets 200 minimum from me. Often more. Funny how that pisses some of you generous, loving, and nice people off.

As I wrote to another person here, Be Nice, be kind. You apparently aren't capable of that, giving

Comment Re:Never underestimate... (Score 1) 83

... the size of an actors ego. Thats the whole reason their do their job , they want to be the centre of attention. However they also want to be seen as more than midwit semi autonomous parrots regurgitating words someone else wrote. They usually fail in this endeavour however.

I watched the golden globes for a few years when Ricky Gervais skewered the crowd. It was surreal, them clapping for a man who was straight out roasting them with truth. Telling them just how useless they were, how they had no right to lecture anyone on anything.

Otherwise, these award shows are just mutual masturbation.

Comment Re: Wait, the Oscars are still a thing? (Score 1) 83

Hollywood was woke the same way GM and Ford were Republican: they had their opinions but they still wanted everyone's money, not just half of everyone's money.

And in practice, they are struggling to get half of people's money.

The really strange takeover of places like Disney by people who hated anyone with a penis, placed politics over storytelling and production competence missed one important fact - people go to movies to be entertained, not lectured. Fan bases are fan bases for a reason. Abandon them at your own risk. What they did to Star Wars should be in a textbook on how to destroy a brand. Taking a golden goose mark that had a lot of males in the fanbase - and make no mistake, a fair number of females loved Star Wars - and ending up making dreary movies, culminating in a "expectation defying" piece of crap about lesbian space witches. Destroying a fan base while replacing it with... nothing.

Movies are entertainment, nothing more. That the crowd making them skews liberal is true. And you can put liberal or conservative elements into movies. Just don't lecture people. Just don't wreck things that already work.

Comment Re:Start paying people normal salaries (Score 1) 207

No this statement "After which we'll hear demands for 100 dollars an hour." and balking at my satire of it is obviously silly. If you want to correct your language now, great, I can accept you misspoke.

Simple math, simple supply and demand. A quick more than tripling of the minimum wage is simply going to have serious consequences. Change my mind.

Again, this is addressed in the article but in there he references several studies and examples of some inflation spike being inevitable just is not really true.

This is amazing to conceive. That an entire "class" of people - those making minimum wage, can have that wage more than tripled, ands the results will be - nothing? All that will happen is they will have around three times the money. There will be no other effects. I'm finding that perhaps a little hard to come to grips with. I do take it that with this tripling, their government assistance will end. No food stamps,(SNAP), no free phones and laptops, no Section 8, no heating fuel assistance. No Babysitting services. All people living on what their paycheck amount is. Therein lies a big question. What will people who have a fair amount of their lives paid for by the government think of a sudden cessation of benefits, and a "You are on your own now."

Now don't get me wrong. I believe that people should just use the money they bring home, and not get assistance. It makes sense. It is hardly possible at the Federal minimum level. But the dynamics of all this are seriously messy when we more than triple income at the bottom end.

These government programs I mentioned are a workaround for the ridiculously low Federal minimum wage we have now. My wife's friend - the registered pharmacist who works as a waitress, has section 8 housing, free laptop and phone, and SNAP. Truth is, she's living pretty okay. I'd call it roughly lower middle class. These bennies are available for everyone depending on income level.

Is it true in states with already higher minimum wage? Other countries with higher MW? There's also the fact that in this scenario there is zero increase in money supply, it is a wealth transfer.

Washington State has been adjusting its minimum wage incrementally in a cost of living setup. Probably the best approach. I do not know what effect this has regarding low income benefits.

In irony, the government assistance programs are wealth transfer.

In the end, quickly tripling the minimum wage could end up eroding the number of low skilled jobs as employers cut back on staff, and/or lean further into automation, permanently eliminating jobs. Or the old "Private contractor" canard - making the Minnies be their own employer.

As I noted way earlier, this is not even remotely simple. And since you want to claim I never read the link you cited, your guy says that there will be inflation with things like 15 dollar Big Macs Here's what he has to say; "There have been headlines lately about $15 Big Macs, and in California some fast food chains have closed since the minimum wage went up. They say this like it’s a bad thing. If we were to foot taxes to the externalities — which is what government is supposed to do — we’d have beef and gas at $20/pound and $10/gallon. Yes, fast food restaurants and many retail, hospital network, and prison system stocks would decline. And it would be worth it."

So he admits that he not only agrees there will be inflation, but he encourages it - he says that it would be worth it.

And that, my friend, is a pretty hard sell, and guess who will be affected the most? The minimum wage people paying 10 dollars per gallon for gasoline, and 20 dollars per pound beef - that's who. They'd still be working around an hour to buy that pound of beef.

Comment Re:Start paying people normal salaries (Score 1) 207

So... just never increase it ever because there might be demands for increases in the future?

Come on guy I know you're capable of better than this.

I want to discuss - Can you point out where I said there can never be demands for increases. I just notes a possible outcome.

Point is, if everyone near the Minimum wage gets a raise, What is. likely to happen, is that expenses will increase. If people at the bottom suddenly make 50 K per year, all of the people who get "bumped" up will have more money, and prices will rise to reflect that. And soon, it's a continual inflationary spiral.

With a more rational increase there will be less inflationary impact. It is basic supply and demand.

Comment Re:Start paying people normal salaries (Score 1) 207

Did you read the article? Galloway makes a pretty compelling argument, even I was on the fence about that high a number but I've started to become convinced particualrly when for my entire life we couldn't raise it because of prices and labor markets and doom and doom and yet all those things have happened with a $7.25 minimum wage

Do they get a bump in pay?

Probably yes, if suddenly you are making minimum wage, even at $25 the floor rises so other wages will rise with them particularly in that 50-150k middle class rage. It will be a large disruption as people start to seek out new jobs but that isn't a bad thing necessarily.

In the end, the situation will be the same then. After which we'll hear demands for 100 dollars an hour.

Slashdot Top Deals

Every nonzero finite dimensional inner product space has an orthonormal basis. It makes sense, when you don't think about it.

Working...