Comment We already have a kill switch solution (Score 3, Funny) 40
It's a paper copy of underground utility records and a backhoe.
It's a paper copy of underground utility records and a backhoe.
Probably the next code that it outputs will be:
# You're out of uploads for today, so if you want me to stop this vehicle anytime soon, upgrade your plan now!
Our walmart installed these price-as-you-go tags a while ago and I have literally seen them change as I walk up to them, and then change again as I walk away. The trick to get them not to change is to be holding your phone at them - the store's AI won't change the tags if it thinks you're filming them.
My Walmart is worse than that. They didn't have any price tags at all. Just video screens with AI avatars of a guy in baggy pants sitting cross-legged on a rug.
When I walk by, he says "Look at my cotton swabs! I offer you the best cotton swabs in the land!"
I say: "Well, how much to they cost?"
He squints at me, looks me up and down for a long while, then says: "For you........ I give to you seven hundred and fifty swabs for two pieces of silver only. Believe me when I say you will search this entire kingdom and not find a better deal!"
The conversation only seems unnatural because they didn't use the right avatar.
If you choose the "Max Headroom" avatar, then everything will look and feel exactly as you would expect. Moreover, the dystopian vibe he gives off will be a perfect fit with the current state of the world.
Wrong again.
Moreover, many of the big complex systems I've worked on were big and complex mainly because OOP nitwits had designed them. They often didn't understand how computers actually work, lost sight of the fact that they were writing a computer program, and spewed out frameworks that filled countless gigabytes of resident memory with endlessly deep layers of nothingburger abstractions. Maybe that didn't matter so much when memory was cheap, but that's no longer the case.
If you think that there's only one way to deal with large data sets, you're a just noob that needs more experience before spouting your theories.
...Modern ejector seats cause spinal injuries from which full recovery is "unusual". Smashing the spines of pilots might not be the most effective way to boost morale.
$22,000 per hour. The F35 will be nearer $42,000 per hour. These are under-estimates, as they do not include price hikes, crashes that close businesses, crashing into businesses, crashing into heavily-populated sports centres, etc.
My late wife did undergraduate research in photosystem II where there was quantum effects back in 2002. She did her PhD thesis on proton coupled electron transfer (PCET) in soybean lipoxogenase, then had a long career developing models for Fortran code that did quantum simulation of proteins (she was behind Tagdock in Amber MD). This is nothing new; several biological systems have quantum effects that are central to their mechanism.
C++ is just as much of a sieve as C, only more obtuse.
"Object models" are an anti-feature.
Dr. Dobb's Digest March 2009: The Safe C Library
Dr. Dobb's Journal March 1991: Array bounds checking with Turbo C
The ideal for memory safety is to have an air-tight pressure vessel.
With C, you're starting that task with a colander. You've managed to fill two of the colander's holes with silicone caulk. Congratulations.
A space weapons arms race plus one million data center satellites.
What could possibly go wrong?
Renewable aren't actually cheap.
And fission plants definitely aren't cheap.
Especially if you include the unsolved issues such as waste barrels stranded on the beach.
"But but no true Scotsman would put barrels..."
Just shut up.
followed by an em-dash
I guess that proves that even this site is using AI to write their summaries these days.
Obviously, if you approximate a complex system containing 1e30 quantum particles using a couple of differential equations and a few boundary conditions, you're not going catch every detail.
It want's its Tivo back.
Who still uses a Tivo? Who even still has a cable service to hook it to?
I've never used TiVo, but I'm still using MythTV after more than 20 years. (Anybody else here using it?
I ditched cable 15 years ago, but it works fine with an antenna. (Or, at least it will until they screw us all over with ATSC 3.0.)
They can't remove the auto-ad-skip on free open-source software, but I never used it anyway. It's not 100% reliable at detecting the ad boundaries, and it occasionally skips over part of the actual show. Instead, I just FF at 60X through the ads.
Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (9) Dammit, little-endian systems *are* more consistent!