The humans are also predicting what should go next based on what fits using their experience and learnings. Pretty similar in this case

What a pointless post.

Everyone knows that bots backed by LLMs aren't people, they're just using words to explain the actions in a way that's more understandable to humans. As a human, this is more helpful since it would be a pretty lame article just listing the weights that guided the decisions made by the model

There are lots of tools I don't know how to use which are complicated and require some learning to use. For example I've never learned the 3d modelling software Blender and opening it looks hard to use. Does that make people who know how to use Blender and find it helpful that tell me to read the manual "pathetic and not very smart"?

I guess all code is based on existing code bases if that's how you want to go with it. Nothing is written from scratch except people that have never been exposed to code before.

Not the view most people would go with but it has a certainty to it for sure

The people calling all AI output slop are the ones that messed around with LLMs a couple years ago and then didn't keep up with them. Most new software now contains code generated by LLMs

What would you call it then? Doesn't look like it's built off an existing code base

Some places they do end up in neighborhoods like this one:
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Fmaps%2F%404...

The TDS sufferers are the ones that think the Iran war is actually going well and gas is cheaper

We'll just add that to the list of other things you'll never do - like reading the second sentence of the summary

Because the scenario isn't plausible. The student would have to load it in something without color or copy it and then they blindly followed the instruction to include "Madagascar" in a way that makes no sense without questioning it?

They mean cyber-security-related tasks. If you read a bit further, it's trained on general coding, but not as much on stuff like decoding binaries and exploiting vulnerabilities. I'd expect it to be a little less effective in some areas than it could be (or Mythos is) due to this

That's gonna add an extra $10-$20 to the cost of the game though compared to a disc that's a few cents

Depending the location, EMS might not be at a standard address, might be on a call or waiting in some random parking lot.

Some forms like bottles and milk jugs have a higher rate, but it's brought down by all the generic plastic containers, often containing a mixture of plastics.

Manufacturers should be forced to have a contract with some company that will actually do the recycling in order to mark something as recyclable, not just have a theoretical process

First of all, props to student 22 who clearly didn't cheat on the midterm and managed to do better on the final, but it looks like about 85 out of 89 students cheated.

With cheating being so easy, professors really need to be having in-person tests to see if the students are learning anything. I wonder if giving students the exact same test out of class and then in class would show who cheated more clearly