The VR game Half Life Alyx was excellent

It was impressive! It was a mostly decentralized communications app where calls were routed over clients that were promoted to supernodes meaning it didn't have a huge bandwidth, but then weirdly eBay bought it and it didn't really fit into eBay's business model so it languished for a while to a time where that technology didn't really work and wasn't needed

Let's be clear here - he wasn't fired for being insecure, he was fired because people found out he was being insecure and it was becoming too much of a distraction from all the crimes against humanity the administration was trying to do. According to Trump, he wasn't even fired, he was promoted to UN Ambassador

How do you think connectors are being attached to boards? Screws? Tape?

Pretty much every modern device uses solder to attach connectors to a board

Sounds like you're not familiar with the latest generation of LLMs. They've come a long way in the past 5 years so it might be worth giving them another try. If you're not yet taking advantage of them I would encourage you to as they're a really useful tool

Wikipedia already uses lots of bots to update formatting fight vandalism, etc. It would be crazy if they avoided using newer technology to help improve the site.

I would assume that any informational changes would still come from (or at least be reviewed by) humans or there wouldn't be much point to it existing over just using the AI tools directly

As have many others that are more credible.

Aren't we all?

In this case "consider" means that it's checking the probabilities against the training data and "makes sense" means that the phrase matches data it was trained on. Seems like you might not be considering how words have meanings that apply to different situations where they could make sense

If you ask for an explanation of a phrase then the AI model is going to give you an explanation for the phrase. If it's not one with an existing explanation, then you're basically asking it to consider what explanation would make sense for it and to come up with one.

What exactly is the issue here? If the questions were vetted by professionals and found to be appropriate, does it matter if it was an expert human or machine or cat walking across the keyboard that wrote them to begin with?

It's always astounding there are people on slashdot saying stuff like this. Guess it comes down to one or more of the following
1. They don't understand the technology - usually see people comparing LLMs to Markov generators and the like
2. They've never used the technology or seen demonstrations by third parties
3. They're unable to consider uses. Even if you can only imagine LLMs being bullshit generators, there's a huge demand for bullshit of different types.
4. They're afraid of the technology and don't want to admit it exists

CashApp does federal and state for free for almost everyone. That's using the mainstream definition of "free" as in you don't have to pay them any money for the service

Well at least we know on slashdot we're safe from that sort of watermarking

We should convict them both in that case, right?