Naw. It will be someone else. Ken Paxton is about to take John Cornyn's place as Senator.

This was already covered in Dan Simmons' Hyperion back in the late 1980s. One AI buys a copy of the book, instantly reads it and then shares it with his friends just like normal folk.

Yes! Please spend more of my money on people I don't know on things they don't need. I love it when you do that. Oh wait. They actually stopped it from happening? That doesn't sound like congress. All they want to do is spend my money. This sounds made up.

The "Cruel" made me lol, so thanks for that :)

Yes please, sign me up to take untested medication to help with my cold.
Yikes!

All I read was Blah, blah, blah, I want to force an employer to do things the way I think they should be done.

If the driver's aren't making enough money (profit sharing, benefits, 401k, etc = more money), they wouldn't be doing it. It's not like the drivers are forced to work for Uber. They can do the same thing for one of the competitors, or they can go do some other job.

You think drivers should make more, but the market disagrees. That means you are wrong.

Big Corporations lied. In 20 years we will find out that Big Paper has been lying to us about paper recycling.

Yes, "Finally"! I don't like it when people say mean things on the cyber. It hurts muh feelings, so I need to be protected from it.

"Between November 2017 and October 2018, people on basic income worked an average of 78 days, which was six days more than those on unemployment benefits."
That 78 has to be a typo. If it's not, I'm not impressed. They basically took a bunch of losers who only work 72 days a year. Gave them some money and they now work 78 days a year. Normal people work around 250 days a year. Heck, call it 200 if you have LOTS of vacation/holidays. So these losers are working less than half as many days as normal people 72 or 78 days a year, either way, they are a drain on society and deserve to starve.

It's weird to see all these newfags posting pro censorship drivel. Either it is a platform and they aren't legally liable for content, or they are publisher and they are legally liable for content. If you are censoring content, then you are a publisher and in control of what is published. I don't care which way YouTube chooses to go, but you can't censor and at the same time be not liable for content.

We have like 360 days left in this decade. None of these will happen in that short amount of time.

For real though, who the fuck still uses google for search?

This guys an idiot. More regulation is *exactly* what we need. SMH.

Wow, I've been absent from here for a decade or so. When did /. become home to fascists that want to suppress speech they don't like?
Also, sounds like twitter is a publisher and should be treated as such. At least /. is still a platform where people can have an honest discussion.