Agree. This is academic 'research' rent seeking because of the increased likelihood that an academic journal would publish a paper that confirms one or more long held left leaning talking points (even untrue talking points).
It is 50 years into this women/men earnings talking points football match.
The academic research community should be able to evaluate the wages earned for the same job and same work hours in a scientific way and publish the results.
This decades long political orthodoxy of never letting new data disprove left leaning talking points and disprove the oppressor / oppressed dogma needs to stop.
Failing to reevaluate this dogma keeps the (both political parties) platform of decay, status quo, stagnation, and decline in living standards.
The women who were penalized with job loss, lower pay, and other negative bias effects are retired and in their 70s or older.
It is not the responsibility of men 18 to 65, nor is it the government's responsibility to provide handouts, special programs, priority job placement and contracting to women 18-65 who were never ones discriminated against in jobs, hiring or contracting
If anything, banks, old-line corporations, the government need to apologize to women 70 or older. An 18 year old women today should not receive extra government services, special programs or extra government spending becasue someone older than 70 may have had negative treatment in employment.