Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Another part of the story. (Score 4, Insightful) 282

I remember a discussion I had over 20 years ago here on slashdot with one someome who proudly declared that the USA would never become a tyranny because the "oathkeepers" would overthrow any tyrant with their firearms. I told them that those "oathkeepers" most likely will join the jackboots instead and it looks like I was right.

America looks disturbingly like 1930s Germany right now.

Comment Re:That's curious (Score 1) 90

I've been reading a lot about this and for the last 20 years largely the agw global warming advocates have INSISTED that food crops wouldn't flourish in higher CO2 environs (despite obvious logical and ample evidence - cf greenhouses commonly run at higher co2 concentrations for just this reason).

I'm guessing I should avoid greenhouse grown crops now because of the higher lead levels? Probably not.

Comment Re:Why not cut this crap out. (Score 2) 46

As a long time F1 fan I think this last season was the best in a while, down to the last race with three numerically possible champions instead of one driver running away with every race all season. I'm not sure what the new rules are going to look like in action next year so like you I'll wait and see. I'm confident it is probably not going to suck.

Comment No biggie then. (Score 3, Insightful) 44

Once he figured out how much electricity these AI systems would likely consume, he could use that to forecast the amount of planet-heating pollution that would likely create. That came out to between 32.6 and 79.7 million tons annually. For comparison, New York City emits around 50 million tons of carbon dioxide annually.

So one big city's worth for the entire planet? It actually does not seem so bad when you put it that way.

Comment Re:Since when ... (Score 1) 20

We have, as a society, made crime all of our concerns

We have also elected officials to be empowered with the responsibility for enforcing laws. Nobody elected Google. And 'we' have put the collective rope and tree approach to law enforcement behind us.

We also have separate criminal and civil laws, the former primarily enforced by those you mention and the latter primarily used by others, including in this case Google.

Comment Re:Of course he did... (Score 1) 89

Maybe you don't realize that NRDC, Greenpeace, or Sierra Club don't have any power to regulate anything?

And we are profoundly grateful for that.

Democrats regulate harmful things when we give them the power to do so.

They also consider a vastly larger number of things harmful, so the actual choice is more like between overregulation and underregulation. Living in a highly overregulated country myself I can see the attraction of the latter.

Slashdot Top Deals

"The value of marriage is not that adults produce children, but that children produce adults." -- Peter De Vries

Working...