Maybe you don't realize that NRDC, Greenpeace, or Sierra Club don't have any power to regulate anything?
And we are profoundly grateful for that.
Democrats regulate harmful things when we give them the power to do so.
They also consider a vastly larger number of things harmful, so the actual choice is more like between overregulation and underregulation. Living in a highly overregulated country myself I can see the attraction of the latter.
Being a part of society has non-negotiable responsibilities. There is no opt out.
Also, government is the enemy.
I think this is an excellent example for misinformation by providing data without context. Congratulations!
Here, more context. You're welcome.
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fec.europa.eu%2Feurostat%2F...
It's a good thing we don't let AI run the oil refineries (yet). The gasoline fractions can be cracked into lighter fuels, such as propane and butane, or reformed into heavier fuels such as diesel.
The technology to do this is already in use.
You can't just enter some numbers in the refinery controls and get whichever products you want from a barrel of oil. There are very real limits and costs associated with cracking and reforming. Fluid catalytic cracking is the most common, but there are still fixed ranges for the outputs in which it operates.
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ebsco.com%2Fresearch...
just say nice things at his funeral.
I suspect most other world leaders will be skipping that.
Doesn't Toyota sell their three "bread and butter" models, the Camry, Corolla and Yaris, on the US market? Does Mazda sell their equivalents, the 6, 3, and 2, there?
There are lots of small imported cars in the US market for people who want them. Most people want trucks and SUVs. It's funny how that seems to make so many people's heads explode. See my sig.
you might be able to replace the Chinese crap^H^H^H^Hfirmware with an OpenIPC [openipc.org]-based firmware.
I've looked at OpenIPC and I've seen some other unofficial camera firmware hacks for various cameras I've owned. Have not tried any as I've had no need of the extended functionality. Well except Magic Lantern on my Canon DSLR, but that is different.
If one must use a wireless link to cross a distance (say, over a large yard — maybe from an outbuilding to the main building) and have a need to install more than just one camera in the remote location, buy a separate, dedicated "WiFi bridge" device pair. Then wire the cameras in the remote location with Ethernet/PoE, and pass all their traffic over this single WiFi link (where their streams will be orderly interleaved), instead of utilizing the WiFi radios of the cameras themselves (those are better turned off). Performance will be much better this way.
Yes, for any sort of longer range dedicated wireless links are the way to go. I've set up many bridges from Cisco and Cambium before I retired. You can also use a wifi range extender (I've used some TPlink ones) to convert wired cameras to wifi. I recently did this with some cameras that could not do WPA3 or 5Ghz, now they do, and the cable between them allows for more optimal placement for the best signal rather than where the camera happens to be.
The best book on programming for the layman is "Alice in Wonderland"; but that's because it's the best book on anything for the layman.
