Comment Re:If they are thermally efficient enough (Score 1) 75
If one spends a lot of money on something, it is kind of save to assume he has done his math.
A single star link satellite for example makes Space X 450million earnings.
If one spends a lot of money on something, it is kind of save to assume he has done his math.
A single star link satellite for example makes Space X 450million earnings.
Yeah, and what exactly did I said wrong?
Most flight attendents are not competing about the two (male?) pilots.
What would be the point of that?
If they are female: they have a BF at the destination and at the departure port
Don't play stupid.
A flight from Bangkok (BKK) to Frankfurt (FRA) is about 12h.
There is a 36h mandatory sleep over period before the return flight.
I am entitled to call "nonsense", to what ever I consider to be nonsense.
For example: 3) I have seen several studies that indicate most abusers come from entitled families and were not themselves abused as a child.
That is nonsense. I suggest to google a bit around. Basically every abuser (does not necessarily mean sexual) was abused as child.
In most of the western world day care, kinder garden, primary school, secondary school: is free.
Unless you have special wishes and do not like to take logical place.
8 billion is fine, too.
The only big difference is: in catastrophes, now more people are involved.
This "new" site is part of a larger effort by that slob to kneecap or compromise US government Web sites, and steal your personal data.
I first read about the effort here: https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fthedreydossier.substac...
Yesterday, she took a look under the hood of America.gov, and yes, it's as bad as everything else the DOGE vandals have been doing: https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fthedreydossier.substac...
Up until this point, government Web sites were designed, built, and maintained by the agencies responsible for that government service. For example, if you wanted to apply for or renew your passport, you would go to state.gov, which is run by the US Department of State, which is responsible for processing applications for and issuing passports. No other department has lawful jurisdiction over passports.
From the point of view of the law, that's still true. But the slob, without anyone's permission, kluged together passports.gov. This site was built and is run by the White House's "National Design Studio," completely outside the law and without any independent oversight. The State Department was not consulted and has nothing to do with it. Further, the site is filled with third-party trackers, analytics, and some custom code that copies every page you view, including form contents, to an unknown third party.
Oh, and the guy leading the National Design Studio and in charge of building these fake sites? He's Joe Gebbia -- cofounder of Airbnb. Read both articles for more details.
In short, you should treat America.gov as a malware site and stay well away from it. Under no circumstances should you feed it any of your personal information.
The flight attendants do like the pilots do: they have BF/GF in every port. Lots less complicated.
I think most people writing nonsense like you simply do not grasp the way other people think.
My EX GF in Thailand, is a sibling of 14 kids. Three died in childhood. She is the youngest. If Ginness book would have been around her birth time, her mother would be noted. She gave birth at age 66 or so. My EX is ten years younger than her youngest brother. Six siblings died in young adulthood, and now 4 are left.
(Mostly) EVERYONE in that family has only ONE child. Some have two, because they divorced and remarried and got a second.
No sane person wants more than one or two kids. It is a complete no brainer for a Thai that, 3 is maximum and 1 is optimum.
I have NO CHILDREN, because my childhood was absolutely ABUSE miserable. And I was afraid I make my kids miserable, too. Because: ABUSE is TRANSMITTED!
Modern Thai in general do not have more than one kid. And that has nothing to do with "cost" but how we call it today: life work balance.
If I have a 8 year old kid, traveling the world is easy. If a second one pops up, I am blocked 6 years to have my own life. Most people do not pick that option.
In most countries pre natal care: is cost free!
Now I only need a cool state job, and I can date 100ds of sexy Asian girls!
I am hot already!!
You do not know anything about agile.
As everything you claim about it: is factually wrong.
If you ever did "an agile project", then it was not an agile project, but a project with the stamp agile on it.
It can not be so hard to grasp how agile projects (are supposed to) work. And then compare what you actually did with what you were supposed to do.
Endless meetings? Not agile
Bugs
Deploying not working code? Not agile
No architecture? Not agile
And so on.
In Europe the copyright is on the person using the AI. Which extents to the company the person is working for.
No idea how the US interpretation works
I understand: the AI itself can not claim copyright, which makes sense.
I am not 100% certain, but I think I never used any Calculus in my CS work all my work life.
Linear algebra I did
You "kind of" need it in energy companies, but then people would nitpick and claim: that is not (linear) algebra!
Would not call it a waste of time, but it is an unnecessary hurdle for students who want to learn "programming".
There is no damn computer that has any opcode or high level language (except high specialized math tools) to do Calculus.
No idea what your point with AI is.
In my mind: I was recently on slashdot.jp.
In reality it is about 2 years ago - and right now the site does not exist anymore.
So, somehow I lost track what you actually are about.
Well, I never used a a password on slashdot.jp, as I only glanced on it to check how much I can read - which is basically 10% of the Kanji
I did not say that transaction tracking is novel.
On the other hand: I have no idea what you're trying to say with this. I do not remember
That is a German word that does not really translate to English. So some English people just use the same word: Schadenfreude.
a million investors lost an alleged $3.8 billion on their purchases
You could enjoy (Freude) the "damage" (Schaden) some investors got by betting on Trump.
However: the money is not lost. It only changed owner. And the new owner benefits from it, likely it is Trump.
Dead? No excuse for laying off work.