Comment Re:cheap EVs (Score 1) 88
No. The F150 is mostly empty. Burning batteries is really toxic.
True, because inhaling the smoke from gasoline and diesel fires is so good for your health
No. The F150 is mostly empty. Burning batteries is really toxic.
True, because inhaling the smoke from gasoline and diesel fires is so good for your health
If these cheap EVs are going to spontaneously combust
Where does it say EVs caught fire? It only says the fire started on a deck that had EVs on it. Stats say the ICEV are far more likely to catch fire than a EV and there was 2400 ICEV on that boat with petrol in them, you know that flammable stuff.
There were 3,048 cars on that ship, 681 were hybrids and another, 70 were fully electric. The news outlets make it sound like all 3048 were electric. Some are more honest and mention the around 700 hybrids but still count these hybrids as "electric cars". I was only able to find one that actually reported the number of BEVs. Out of these the most fire prone are the Hybrids, followed by the full ICE cars and finally the BEVs which are by far the least likely to catch fire. The fire started: "in a deck carrying electric vehicles" meaning what started the fire was likely a Hybrid but we'll likely never know for sure. Not that any of this will stop Sky News and the luddites from claiming the ship was filled to the hatches with BEVs and that they all caught fire simultaneously and rendered Adak, Alaska 300 miles away uninhabitable due to toxic smoke.
Americans are Buying Twice as Many Hybrids as Fully Electric Vehicles. Is The Next Step Synthetic Fuels?
Hybrids are a stepping stone for conservative people with extreme anxieties about new technology i.e. about 40-50% percent Americans (excluding the MAGA base that thinks electric cars are a manifestation of satanic communism and that would rather ride a mule to work than drive an EV). The next step is usually a full EV when people figure out that range anxiety is bullshit and they spend most of their time driving their hybrid in full EV mode anyway. Aaaand yes, given the way the US works, with all the corruption and pork Americans seem to have come to consider normal I expect a lot of money to be wasted on synthetic fuels to keep the corpse of ICE industry twitching and as en excuse to pay out even more subsidies for chemical corporations and farmers in deep red Trump voting districts. Meanwhile I just returned from a tour of several developing countries in SE Asia where I kept track of the types of EVs and hybrids I saw. Chinese and S-Korean cars dominate with at least one Vietnamese brand sprinkled in, nothing American, hardly any Teslas, some European EVs, mostly luxury models and they seem to be transitioning directly to full EVs, no existential anxieties about new technologies there.
Fuck You.
signed,
Fuck You
If you believe that stealth fighters are worthless then you need to learn of the "you should go home now" incident in 2013: https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3F...
An F-22 approached an Iranian F-4 that was attempting to shoot down an American drone. The F-4 pilot did not detect the F-22 on radar even when close enough that the F-22 pilot could visually inspect the F-4 weapon load-out. The F-4 pilot only became aware of the F-22 once the F-22 pulled up alongside the F-4 so that it was clearly in view of the pilot and called on the radio, "You should go home now."
The F-22 also had the advantage of data from other sensors like AEW&C and space based systems streamed directly into its cockpit whereas the IRAF doesn't have any of that and the F-4 pilot was entirely reliant on his forward sensor cone which the F-22 definitely avoided. A Typhoon J-10, J-16, Gripen or Rafale with access to fused data from multiple sensor layers streamed directly into the pilot's cockpit and an onboard IRST system would be far more difficult to surprise like that.
I can imagine someone saying this could not be repeated since the F-4 radar is likely quite outdated so the F-22 pilot got lucky. That F-4 wasn't the only aircraft in the air, there were ground stations in Iran searching the area for aircraft as that's how they knew where the drone was. Nobody saw the F-22 coming. Could newer radar detect the F-22 coming. Actually they can. They can detect the F-22 but not with enough resolution to fire upon it, at least not until within range of the weapons on the F-22.
Newer radar can guide a missile near enough for the missile's onboard sensors to find the F-22 acquire it and lock on for terminal guidance. Depending on the situation and how stealth the BVR missile is F-22 pilot might not even realize that he was being shot at until he was lit up by that missiles radar system (and that's assuming it doesn't use passive sensors for terminal guidance). This is basically what happened to that Rafale driver in India not that long ago.
Why, it's almost as if the web was meant to be a many-to-many relationship and we weren't supposed to all be dependent on a single point of failure.
I wonder if the Internet can figure out how to stop putting control of every last goddamn dollar on Earth under the control of a single company full of people who are sexually obsessed with destroying creation? This is what, round three after IBM and Microsoft?
They've laid off 9000 people in the last two years.
Microsoft posted record-breaking financial results in both FYâ2023 and FYâ2024. Additionally, several quarters since then: especially Q2 FYâ2024 and Q3 FYâ2025 were flagged internally as "record" or exceptionally strong performances.
In fiscal year 2024 they made $245 billion in revenue.
Time to use all those pagers they bought a few years ago.
Iran didn't use all those pagers, Hezbollah did. What eventually made the Israelis use the pager bombs was some of the pagers being sent to Iran for in-depth forensic examination. Furthermore, after Russia hacked SolarWinds and used their update servers to install backdoors on systems belonging to government departments such as US Homeland Security, State, Commerce and Treasury, that time Chinese intelligence hacked US military contractors, stole F-35 design data and then hacked the US federal government's system for court authorized wiretapping I'd say this seems like a very sensible precaution. I could also bring up the that time White House National Security Advisor Michael Waltz invited a reporter into a Telegram group discussing classified aspects of airstrikes on Yemen but that wasn't an IT failure so much as it was just down to the galactic stupidity of Waltz and the other US government officials involved plus, I don't want to kick a dead horse.
There are statutory regulations and constitutional issues here. To qualify to serve as an O-5 in the Army you need time in grade, time in service and considerable training. You also have to be confirmed by the United States Senate.
Sorry. This story is bullshit. Just like everything else on social media.
But reasoning with people about their religious faith is a waste of time.
I'm still right.
through therapy-themed bots that claim to have credentials and confidentiality "with inadequate controls and disclosures."
That right there is some straight up bullshit. These people are living in a fantasy world. There is no legal provision for a goddamn chat bot to be "credentialed" for any purpose at all, especially where human mental health is concerned.
I'm as big a supporter of technology and science as the next person, but this slavish worship of solutions to math problems as a substitute for God is going to stop, or AI is going to get regulated into oblivion, and that might not be a bad outcome.
AI is very complex math that simulates the right answer. It is physically impossible for it to be anything else. If you claim otherwise you are not only being unscientific, you're a liar.
My job interview script:
0. Jobs are adult daycare
1. You can't afford me
2. Say hi to your wife and my kids
3. I have your customer list
Americans are in a race to save what's left. No guarantee they'll succeed. This country is submerged in infected shit. Only way out is to stop applying 1992 solutions to 2025 problems.
With all due respect to Sean Connery I give us one chance in three.
With all the fancy scientists in the world, why can't they just once build a nuclear balm?