Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Lawyers! Start Your Engines! (Score -1) 9

Can't wait to see the wording of the contract. Because if it has standard licensing provisions in it, that's airtight grounds for an instant lawsuit if your content is used and you aren't "eligible" to be compensated.

The contents of their big bucket of AI will then be subject to subpoena.

Microsoft will then assert fair use, at which point the plaintiff's attorney will remind them of the legal concept of "estoppel." The judge will agree (because the plaintiff will be correct) and Microsoft will either settle or be looking at judgments for willful infringement that go on forever and ever and ever.

God bless you Microsoft. Can't wait to see that contract.

Comment Why Stop There? (Score -1) 14

It would take an array of AI enabled machines half an hour to find everyone in this country a job. Not only that every candidate would be qualified.

If you want to replace someone have AI replace the hiring managers so the seven million unemployed people in this country can stop wasting their time updating resumes and get back on the field.

Comment The Problem is Simple (Score -1) 100

The Internet does not reward quality. In fact, the Internet ruthlessly punishes quality. Platforms turn up the volume on tards and turn down the volume on educated voices. Tards get more clicks from other tards.

The Internet (both platforms and audiences) rewards spam, slop, outrage bait, lies, fraud and girls of indeterminate age dancing in their pajamas, in no particular order. You get more of what you reward.

Social media and AI slop were made for each other. Let's hope they get hopelessly entangled and sink into the tar pit together. Good riddance.

Slashdot Top Deals

For every bloke who makes his mark, there's half a dozen waiting to rub it out. -- Andy Capp

Working...