Comment Re: Cybersecurity or bringing a few jobs stateside (Score 1) 56
It's weird that you couldn't admit that you were wrong
It's absolutely hilarious that you can't understand that everyone is on the same page here but you.
It's weird that you couldn't admit that you were wrong
It's absolutely hilarious that you can't understand that everyone is on the same page here but you.
The extreme left has demonstrated they refuse to accept election outcomes
Is the extreme left in the room with us? Time to take your meds, kid.
Did antone ever tell you that you whine like a little bitch?
Who's antone, your daddy? Nice work there, sport. Not that I didn't know you were triggered by being shown up already.
The experience was always fraught with problems, brittle, and wouldn't work again after having been left fallow for a few months. This was true whenever I tried it though the project history.
Wine has historically changed a lot from one major version to the next. Therefore if you got a Windows program working with Wine, and upgraded Wine, it would IME usually stop working. This isn't true any more, although it's still a danger. These days having multiple wine versions and using a launcher is a way to handle this. There is no problem running multiple wine versions at once.
Florida residents affected by the breach will receive a letter offering one year of free credit monitoring through Sontiq, Inc.
They can get that free from Experian, so... whogivesafuck? That's really just advertising for Sontiq, they are hoping people will sign up after the free year for something they could get for free somewhere else.
(Experian is doing it to try to trick you into buying services by diddling their version of your credit score up and down, sell you access to your other credit scores you can get for free, get you to apply for other lines of credit, etc. But you can do none of that shit and still get free credit monitoring.)
We get it. You made a fool of yourself,
You get another chance to be a dipshit and you take it. What a clueless fucknut.
Umm.. do you see any MBAs at all the violent protests ?
Why would the machine rage against the machine? You don't turn your thinker on before posting, do ya?
The real question is: what agencies and regulations exist to ensure that this profit motive - useful as it is - serves society's higher goals?
There's always another "real question" behind the question. For example, behind that question it's "who ensures that those agencies do their job" and then it's "who ensure that those people do their job" or maybe it's "who ensures the voters know their asshole from their elbow" ad infinitum.
False. The DoD banned imports of new, foreign-made consumer wireless routers due to claims of national security, supply chain, and cybersecurity risks.
I sit {corrected,in agreement}.
ironically, most of the sand that goes into them was mined in the U.S.
Make America grade again?
Perhaps once the lizards implement the One World Government, we can coordinate that globally.
I presume they're going to want all nukes, all the time, for heat rocks and hydroponic lettuce.
Routers ought to be removed from WiFi, but there is a strong reason why they aren't (and thus won't be).
wat
There are good open source router/firewalls available, and are easily updated/upgraded. Which is why I suggested the WiFi ought to be a separate device.
Well, I'm not against that I guess, but it's not a very specific requirement. Are you requesting that all routers implement WiFi through expansion cards? That would drive up costs slightly, but it's certainly doable. A lot of them are built that way now, though it's usually not the cheapest ones.
Proprietary hardware/software solutions are the problem. Unable to replace the OS/Firmware we are buying a lock-in that we have no control over.
Sure, I agree. But that's also a bundle of very complicated arguments. For example, right now there are power limits and frequency restrictions, and intentional jamming is illegal. A lot of radio devices are locked down tight to prevent you from circumventing these restrictions. I'm of the opinion that anyone should be allowed to receive basically anything accidentally, and transmit anything which doesn't cause harm, but I really don't want a million jerkoffs dicking with settings and causing problems for everyone around them including me.*
I use a router which runs OpenWRT. I bought it because of that, and because it has "plenty" of flash and RAM. (I wish it had more flash sometimes, the RAM is fine.) But it has closed WiFi firmware.
* A fun similar issue I was just talking about is the federal ban on stills for tax reasons... I don't really want every jerkoff to have a still in their garage, the town I live in was burned down almost completely once by one getting out of hand.
You should do some basic research before replying to me in the future.
You should suck a dick before you talk to me like that again.
It was the FCC who instituted the ban.
Try to keep up, cupcake. The Department of Defense (under the name "Department of War") is the agency deciding which routers are accepted, and which told the FCC they were doing this. The FCC is a hand puppet and you're a useful idiot.
and you clearly didn't understand the words I wrote that you quoted.
You put up a good facade of professionalism, but you don't understand the underlying context that this is occurring in, which proves that you don't know half as much as you think you know. We discussed this on Slashdot ages ago, and if you'd been paying attention then, you'd know about this now. Go slip your tiny pecker into an electrical outlet and sing bejesus to someone else, fucknut.
No, you're making shit up and your link doesn't say what you want it to say.
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.reddit.com%2Fr%2Ftoday...
Trump isn't even in charge of his own asshole. He's being manipulated continually.
Putin is doing Poland with drones.
I THINK MAN INVENTED THE CAR by instinct. -- Jack Handley, The New Mexican, 1988.