It's going to happen. It's basically already happened in some stores. IKEAfied Swedish clone brands have for years had their own in-house music channels for their stores, playing basically knockoff pop music.

I too want to be paid in perpetuity for work I did in the past. Sadly my lawyers aren't as well-connected as the entertainment industries'.

Such an unsolvable problem! Except that in many cultures it's been solved for a long time. You have two last names, one patrilineal, one matrilineal.

Hyphenated names go way back, and it's all about prestige. If the wife came from a prestigious family (too), they wanted to let the world know that these kids, they have connection to two prestige families. An example from my part of the world is the former defense minister Kristin Krohn-Devold. Other well known hyphenated prestige names in Norway are Rieber-Mohn, Tybring-Gjedde.

There's not an ever expanding list of hyphenations, that's an entirely imagined problem, and a bit of an "old man rants at cloud for not following tradition" thing. It's more common that the less prestigious name is quietly dropped, and you're back at an unhyphenated name. A fictional, but very plausible example is the main character of the Danish drama "Matador", who changes his name from Mads Skjern-Andersen to just Mads Skjern. I have many examples in my own family tree, of various distant cousins who got a prestige name of a non-paternal ancestor (it may be further back than the mom!) as middle name, and then just quietly dropped their patronym/last name so that the middle name was suddenly a last name.

"Literally hundreds of years", lol. We Europeans are extremely lucky compared to most other parts of the world. In the best places (Belgium, for some reason) you can get back to the 1600s on all lines, not just the paternal. It isn't just colonialism. Europe just kept much better track of its commoners than anywhere else. Japan first implemented a European-style census as part of the Meiji restoration in the 1870s, and it was only then they demanded everyone should have a last name.

To overcome the recent famine challenges, I have decided to

1. Acquire a plot suitable for growing potatoes

2. Reach out to neighbors to pool resources

3. Establish a secure bunker for storing emergency reserves of grain

4. Mapping out the foraging, hunting and fishing opportunities in the nearby hills

5. Cutting off and eating my remaining leg.

What I also think people don't appreciate, is how much work it is to use SNP data even for this. Figuring out how a 3-4 cousin-level match is related, is hard, and it's not easy to automate.

It's enough work that authoritarian goons are more likely to use it as a pretext for punishing whoever they'd like to punish, than to use it to actually find the "guilty" (even after their own standard).

"Nobody ever got fired for choosing IBM" isn't even a metaphor here - the company I currently work for runs a SAP which has been heavily customized by IBM.

Assume for a moment that there is such a thing as an objectively good album. Assume also that there's some luck involved in actually making one, not just skill. You have thousands of bands churning out albums.

Let's assume also that the critics are capable of recognizing an objectively good album at least better than chance.

Now picture a band making album after album, and they succeed in making an actually good one, that gets noticed by critics and called out as great. What are the odds that their next album will be as good?

Not great! If there's luck at all involved, it's very likely that their first album, which managed to get them on critics radar against thousands of rivals, was an outlier in terms of quality. They'll revert to the mean in album two.

That's enough to explain critics typically rating a second album lower. Even if they have widely varying ideals for what a good album sounds like.

For fans it's another matter. Fandom is a social phenomenon, it's never just about the music. It's also about the role the band plays in your life. Not just things like parasocial relationships, although that too, but think about it: If you find another artist that sounds just like artist you know and love, do you immediately jump ship? Of course not. Not even if it turns out that the other artist was "first" in making this style of music. There is such a thing as niches in music, once one is personally filled for you, say you've got all the happy party dance music you needed this month, you're not going to care if there's some objectively 1% better music out there.

So it's also understandable that fans rate second albums higher than critics. That just means they keep fulfilling the role they won in their listeners lives.

They must have wanted it, since they bought it!

Or, their search engine bought it on their behalf. Same thing, surely?

I take it you're saying that is the other crime? Has he been convicted of it yet?

A violation in the first degree occurs when a person falsifies business records with an intent to defraud that includes an intent to commit, aid, or conceal another crime.

OK, and what was this other crime? Has he been convicted of that one yet?

Holy cow, there are a lot of low-digit usernames on Slashdot who don't understand how science works and really like their drinks.

It remains to be seen if Starmer will take this result as an endorsement, or see it for what it really is - dissatisfaction with the Tories.

He will act as if he's personally elected king, and will continue 9 out of 10 Tory policies. Maybe if we're lucky he'll clean up the sewage in the rivers - but he'll certainly never try to claw back the profits from that.

It's very easy to make some authoritative-looking links supporting any well-funded political faction.

Community notes has been ridiculed lately, for automatically attaching a "rebuttal" to every instance of a certain image and keywords. The image is an image of hundreds of burned out cars after the Re'im music festival attack. The community note says something like "this has been conclusively rebutted" and links dozens of mainstream media articles/fact checks. People have been abusing themselves by posting the image with texts like "Elon is not actually a pedophile", only to have the community note angrily denying that attached in minutes.

So so much for the "Community" aspect of community notes. But even for the image itself, it's a master class in manipulative "fact checking". Because all those links don't rebut the burned out cars image, but a different video. It's quite true that that video is not what it claims to be, but it has nothing to do with the burned out cars image. Faced with a very obvious, damning piece of evidence (of something that has been publicly admitted), they dig up a dodgy video claiming to be of the same event, "debunk" that, and use it to claim that the event never happened.

It's a boss issue. Someone wrote a poor program, maybe in the 80s. Then the boss decided that instead of rewriting, their company's way of doing things should be the standard. They persuaded some other bosses of this. Now instead of an expense, you now have a "moat".