Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:They should not allow them for copyright reason (Score 1) 36

The underlying social reason why it should be this way is that copyright is (allegedly) for the purpose of protecting human effort in order to induce additional creations.

First, I would question empirically whether copyright (as normally applied; distinct from copyleft) has even served that goal, for software. I mean in my opinion, the best recent innovations from Microsoft have been 1. open sourcing a lot of stuff, and 2. WSL :)

Secondly, the use of copyright against LLMs serves (again, empirically) as an attempt to suppress creations.

Comment Re:They should not allow them for copyright reason (Score 1) 36

The other argument to be made about LLMs not washing away copyright is that even if they were considered to be thinking, that is arguably not enough to make what they do legal. Even for humans we have the concept of taint, for which we invented clean room engineering as a circumvention strategy. But the LLM doesn't have any separation, as the model is a direct product of the input data.

That's a fair point.

Comment Re:They should not allow them for copyright reason (Score 0) 36

AI code should have to meet the same standards as any other code so that's not the problem, it's the copyright issue. If using AI doesn't wash away copyrights, and there's no reason it should, then accepting AI code should be a non-starter.

See, the devil's advocate in me can't get past the question of why "washing" code through a brain is better?

I didn't invent, say, php. I learned from being exposed to countless examples of it.

When I "write my own code", I'm surely drawing on those examples. Which examples, under what licenses? Who knows?

Yet somehow that's okay.

Comment Re:NO one thinks this merger is a good idea.... (Score 0) 114

Like I said they might try to incorporate in another state in order to do bad things to people

Do you ... ever have like a moment of non- black and white thinking?

Just a little nagging, uneasy feeling, that perhaps things and people are not all good or all bad?

Comment Re:Purchase complete! (Score 1) 71

User: I'm thinking of getting a new car.

Muse: Ok... I have sold your current car and have purchased a new one. I have also resigned from your job and applied for a new one with a better salary so that you can afford the repayments on the new car. I have also taken the liberty of sending flowers to the woman you talked to yesterday at the supermarket. She is quite wealthy. I calculate that if you can marry her within the year your financial problems will be further eased. She is already married, but I have sent suspicious letters to their address to prompt a divorce... Is there anything else you would like me to do?

Yeah, exactly. I definitely don't need or want an "agent" to do things in my life.

Research and organize some info, maybe. Write some code, maybe. Draft something that won't piss people off as much as something I would say off the cuff, maybe.

Buy things for me, or do personal communications for me in non-draft mode? Definitely not.

Comment Re:Not completely safe (Score 1) 136

Why not stop this madness and focus on PARENTS?

Why not indeed? I'm sure that Eurocrats and their supporters are widely known for their devotion to parents being in control, right?

Firstly, not giving unrestricted devices to minors.

Oh sure, society will support that. Why, let's take a poll right here on /., shall we? Bark phones for all!

Secondly, having PARENTS be in the driver's seat to control what sites/people/services are allowed for their children.

Fine with me. Actually fine with the people here who are complaining about this system? Not so much.

Well, you get the idea. Complainers are fine with blaming parents for everything. Letting parents have actual control over their own children though (which would be needed, to go with responsibility), not so much.

Comment Re:Only High I.Q. individuals need apply (Score 0, Troll) 372

To be fair, you only need a room temperature level of IQ to be smarter than literally anyone in the current administration so that isn't a very high bar to clear. I'm sure Trump will promote his Mar-a-Largo janitor to AI Czar if he pledges to give Trump a daily hand job.

Wait... no that poor guy is probably in an ICE detention camp.

I'd be more than happy to vote for smart guys. The problem is, the "smart" guys were all busily importing millions of hostiles, and pretending that boys could magically turn into girls. When they weren't deciding to "defund" the police ... I could go on. And on.

If you are worse than the clown, then the problem isn't the clown ...

Slashdot Top Deals

If a train station is a place where a train stops, what's a workstation?

Working...