That was a ruling on a search which required a warrant, and the ruling states that the district court itself found that the warrant was invalid as it violated the suspect's fourth amendment rights. It would seem to apply except that these are warrantless requests. It also specifically references Carpenter v. United States' determination that such a request as in Chatrie is able to look into the past, which makes possible surveillance which was formerly impossible and was therefore unexpected when the relevant laws were written, but the flock requests we're discussing are for recent information. It remains to be seen whether this court would apply the same logic to these similar but different specific uses.

Defrost? They're not frost free? What year is it? It's not like they're deep freezes.

That's certainly what Putin said, but it's not clear why you would believe it when they went into Ukraine with military vehicles, not with a brass band and a parade, unless... have you suffered some major head injury recently?

So did you miss the part where after Deutsche bank dropped Trump, his kids told us they were doing all their banking with Russia? Trump was broke, all of his properties were fully leveraged, then Putin rode in on a white horse (and no shirt) and saved his bacon.

Every time someone who knows something disagrees with Putin, they're defenestrated. This results in a lot of window-based loss of intelligence, and the rest learning not to offer any. This is not really a new mode of operation, it being cheaper to open a window than to pay for poison, but seems to have ticked up in recent decades.

This is the reason why Timmy had a child tantrum on twitter when Steam decided it would add an AI tag games containing AI allowing consumers to avoid this goopy turd like the cholera it contains.

Maybe Russia is as good at picking its disinformation targets as the US is at picking its bomb targets... outdated.

...Chernobyls

I am sorry the citizens have to live under Putin, does that count?

Who said that? You need to work on your reading comprehension skills, bub.

... always a bad idea. With LLMs, basically incompetent people can hack all instances of such a device everywhere for cheap now.

I doubt the person you answered to has the capacity to understand that.

Obviously, when used correctly, even mu-calculus on stone tablets can be easily used to demonstrate the proof of the Riemann Hypothesis!

Yes, very much so. But that would be good engineering and good engineering is rare in the software space.

Hehehe, stupid is as stupid does. That is why real mathematicians verify a proofs before they build on the result.

I had students try that out in some thesis work. Results were that LLMs find some types of vulnerabilities reasonably reliably and others not at all or only rarely.